Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EHSTX vs RMFEX
EHSTX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts EHSTX vs RMFEX
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value A
Price$26.74
Change+$0.12 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.42B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$59.82
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
EHSTX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EHSTX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EHSTX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. EHSTX (1.42B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than EHSTX: RMFEX (1.53) vs EHSTX (0.95). EHSTX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: EHSTX (94 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). EHSTX (1.00) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). EHSTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than EHSTX: RMFEX (250) vs EHSTX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.81 vs. EHSTX (7.38). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 64.33 vs. EHSTX (58.50).
| EHSTX | RMFEX | EHSTX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.62 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.62 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 94 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.970 | 9.748 | 61% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.42B | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.53 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.38 | 11.81 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.78 | 30.45 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.50 | 64.33 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.00 | 86.20 | 60% |