Advertisement
EHMEF vs MIUFY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EHMEF is a Hold and MIUFY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EHMEF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMIUFY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- EHMEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MIUFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EHMEF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MIUFY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EHMEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MIUFY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
EHMEF (@Savings Banks) experienced а -0.63% price change this week, while MIUFY (@Savings Banks) price change was +1.05% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.93%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Savings Banks (+0.78% weekly)A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.
| EHMEF | MIUFY | EHMEF / MIUFY | |
| Capitalization | 1.82B | 11.3B | 16% |
| EBITDA | 962M | 576B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | -0.279 | 17.004 | -2% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.66 | 11.61 | 83% |
| Revenue | 1.6B | 2.08T | 0% |
| Total Cash | 196M | 385B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 4.14B | 7.99T | 0% |
EHMEF | MIUFY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 88 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 44 Fair valued | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 23 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 82 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 53 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EHMEF's Valuation (44) in the null industry is in the same range as MIUFY (63). This means that EHMEF’s stock grew similarly to MIUFY’s over the last 12 months.
MIUFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EHMEF (56). This means that MIUFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than EHMEF’s over the last 12 months.
MIUFY's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as EHMEF (100). This means that MIUFY’s stock grew similarly to EHMEF’s over the last 12 months.
MIUFY's Price Growth Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as EHMEF (86). This means that MIUFY’s stock grew similarly to EHMEF’s over the last 12 months.
MIUFY's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as EHMEF (60). This means that MIUFY’s stock grew similarly to EHMEF’s over the last 12 months.
| EHMEF | MIUFY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 41% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 26% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 27% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 26% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 15% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 63% | 9 days ago 25% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 13% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MILN | 48.26 | 0.26 | +0.55% |
| Global X Millennials Consumer ETF | |||
| PBMR | 29.81 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - Mar | |||
| LIAG | 183.28 | N/A | N/A |
| Stone Ridge 2052 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF | |||
| IBDT | 25.54 | -0.03 | -0.12% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corp ETF | |||
| IBTL | 20.70 | -0.04 | -0.19% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Tr ETF | |||
EHMEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EHMEF and WSC have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EHMEF and WSC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EHMEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EHMEF | 100% | -4.74% | ||
| WSC - EHMEF | 22% Poorly correlated | -4.34% | ||
| RM - EHMEF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.46% | ||
| UHAL - EHMEF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.79% | ||
| MIUFY - EHMEF | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.05% | ||
| EDNMF - EHMEF | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
MIUFY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MIUFY and EDNMF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MIUFY and EDNMF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MIUFY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIUFY | 100% | +1.05% | ||
| EDNMF - MIUFY | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HTZ - MIUFY | 21% Poorly correlated | -9.78% | ||
| WLFC - MIUFY | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.97% | ||
| EHMEF - MIUFY | 20% Poorly correlated | -4.74% | ||
| PRAA - MIUFY | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.50% | ||
More | ||||