EHMEF
Price
$120.39
Change
-$0.59 (-0.49%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.59B
FAVO
Price
$0.76
Change
-$0.14 (-15.56%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
31.93K
Interact to see
Advertisement

EHMEF vs FAVO

Header iconEHMEF vs FAVO Comparison
Open Charts EHMEF vs FAVOBanner chart's image
GOEASY
Price$120.39
Change-$0.59 (-0.49%)
Volume$1.31K
Capitalization1.59B
Favo Capital
Price$0.76
Change-$0.14 (-15.56%)
Volume$2.2K
Capitalization31.93K
EHMEF vs FAVO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EHMEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FAVO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EHMEF vs. FAVO commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EHMEF is a Hold and FAVO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (EHMEF: $120.39 vs. FAVO: $0.76)
Brand notoriety: EHMEF and FAVO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EHMEF: 32% vs. FAVO: 183%
Market capitalization -- EHMEF: $1.59B vs. FAVO: $31.93K
EHMEF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $1.59B. FAVO’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $31.93K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EHMEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFAVO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EHMEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FAVO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EHMEF is a better buy in the long-term than FAVO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EHMEF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FAVO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EHMEF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FAVO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EHMEF is a better buy in the short-term than FAVO.

Price Growth

EHMEF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +3.47% price change this week, while FAVO (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -12.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +3.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+3.75% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EHMEF($1.59B) has a higher market cap than FAVO($31.9K). FAVO YTD gains are higher at: 205.358 vs. EHMEF (5.052). EHMEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 637M vs. FAVO (-99.38K). EHMEF has more cash in the bank: 41.8M vs. FAVO (95). FAVO has less debt than EHMEF: FAVO (10.2K) vs EHMEF (2.45B). EHMEF has higher revenues than FAVO: EHMEF (1.07B) vs FAVO (0).
EHMEFFAVOEHMEF / FAVO
Capitalization1.59B31.9K4,974,922%
EBITDA637M-99.38K-640,993%
Gain YTD5.052205.3582%
P/E Ratio12.79N/A-
Revenue1.07B0-
Total Cash41.8M9544,000,000%
Total Debt2.45B10.2K24,039,216%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EHMEF vs FAVO: Fundamental Ratings
EHMEF
FAVO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5097
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4872
SMR RATING
1..100
41100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4939
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
72100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EHMEF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is in the same range as FAVO (50). This means that EHMEF’s stock grew similarly to FAVO’s over the last 12 months.

EHMEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as FAVO (72). This means that EHMEF’s stock grew similarly to FAVO’s over the last 12 months.

EHMEF's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FAVO (100). This means that EHMEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FAVO’s over the last 12 months.

FAVO's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as EHMEF (49). This means that FAVO’s stock grew similarly to EHMEF’s over the last 12 months.

EHMEF's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as FAVO (100). This means that EHMEF’s stock grew similarly to FAVO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EHMEFFAVO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EHMEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FAVO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIQOX36.700.20
+0.55%
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Z
FPURX25.520.12
+0.47%
Fidelity Puritan
TSLFX4.770.01
+0.21%
Transamerica Small Cap Value R4
GSBAX14.75N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth C
IAAEX11.06N/A
N/A
Transamerica Mid Cap Value Opps I2

EHMEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EHMEF and TBCRF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EHMEF and TBCRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EHMEF
1D Price
Change %
EHMEF100%
N/A
TBCRF - EHMEF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
ECNCF - EHMEF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDNMF - EHMEF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDNMY - EHMEF
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.90%
ELEEF - EHMEF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
More

FAVO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FAVO and RBRI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FAVO and RBRI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAVO
1D Price
Change %
FAVO100%
N/A
RBRI - FAVO
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EHMEF - FAVO
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCMGF - FAVO
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
ECNCF - FAVO
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCRM - FAVO
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More