EHMEF
Price
$155.56
Change
-$0.59 (-0.38%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
2.5B
FAVO
Price
$1.77
Change
+$0.27 (+18.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
209.97M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EHMEF vs FAVO

Header iconEHMEF vs FAVO Comparison
Open Charts EHMEF vs FAVOBanner chart's image
GOEASY
Price$155.56
Change-$0.59 (-0.38%)
Volume$2.62K
Capitalization2.5B
Favo Capital
Price$1.77
Change+$0.27 (+18.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization209.97M
EHMEF vs FAVO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EHMEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FAVO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EHMEF vs. FAVO commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EHMEF is a Buy and FAVO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (EHMEF: $155.56 vs. FAVO: $1.77)
Brand notoriety: EHMEF and FAVO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EHMEF: 38% vs. FAVO: 9%
Market capitalization -- EHMEF: $2.5B vs. FAVO: $209.97M
EHMEF [@Savings Banks] is valued at $2.5B. FAVO’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $209.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $666.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EHMEF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFAVO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EHMEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FAVO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EHMEF is a better buy in the long-term than FAVO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EHMEF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FAVO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EHMEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FAVO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FAVO is a better buy in the short-term than EHMEF.

Price Growth

EHMEF (@Savings Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FAVO (@Savings Banks) price change was +17.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+0.52% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EHMEF($2.5B) has a higher market cap than FAVO($210M). FAVO YTD gains are higher at: 607.717 vs. EHMEF (35.742). EHMEF has more cash in the bank: 196M vs. FAVO (1.08M). FAVO has less debt than EHMEF: FAVO (31.4M) vs EHMEF (4.14B).
EHMEFFAVOEHMEF / FAVO
Capitalization2.5B210M1,190%
EBITDA962MN/A-
Gain YTD35.742607.7176%
P/E Ratio12.92N/A-
Revenue1.6BN/A-
Total Cash196M1.08M18,165%
Total Debt4.14B31.4M13,178%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EHMEF vs FAVO: Fundamental Ratings
EHMEF
FAVO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3482
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4149
SMR RATING
1..100
39100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4035
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
39100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a22

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FAVO's Valuation (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EHMEF (63). This means that FAVO’s stock grew somewhat faster than EHMEF’s over the last 12 months.

EHMEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as FAVO (49). This means that EHMEF’s stock grew similarly to FAVO’s over the last 12 months.

EHMEF's SMR Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FAVO (100). This means that EHMEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FAVO’s over the last 12 months.

FAVO's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as EHMEF (40). This means that FAVO’s stock grew similarly to EHMEF’s over the last 12 months.

EHMEF's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FAVO (100). This means that EHMEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FAVO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EHMEFFAVO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EHMEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FAVO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OCMPX17.680.20
+1.14%
Lazard International Quality Gr Open
AMCPX46.210.12
+0.26%
American Funds AMCAP A
COMAX28.49-0.03
-0.11%
DWS Digital Horizons A
THLCX23.97-0.05
-0.21%
Thrivent Large Cap Growth S
WWNPX121.41-3.07
-2.47%
Kinetics Paradigm No Load

EHMEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EHMEF and EDNMF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EHMEF and EDNMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EHMEF
1D Price
Change %
EHMEF100%
N/A
EDNMF - EHMEF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDNMY - EHMEF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
ELEEF - EHMEF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
DWIS - EHMEF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FAVO - EHMEF
4%
Poorly correlated
+18.00%
More

FAVO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FAVO and RBRI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FAVO and RBRI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAVO
1D Price
Change %
FAVO100%
+18.00%
RBRI - FAVO
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EHMEF - FAVO
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDNMF - FAVO
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSASF - FAVO
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELEEF - FAVO
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
More