It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EHC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNHC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EHC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NHC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
EHC (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +0.77% price change this week, while NHC (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -0.38% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1650.69%.
EHC is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
NHC is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2024.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
EHC | NHC | EHC / NHC | |
Capitalization | 8.27B | 1.45B | 570% |
EBITDA | 1.03B | 131M | 782% |
Gain YTD | 54.752 | 42.910 | 128% |
P/E Ratio | 23.18 | 21.31 | 109% |
Revenue | 4.8B | 1.14B | 420% |
Total Cash | 69.1M | 224M | 31% |
Total Debt | 2.93B | 93.4M | 3,140% |
EHC | NHC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 37 Fair valued | 20 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 15 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NHC's Valuation (20) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as EHC (37). This means that NHC’s stock grew similarly to EHC’s over the last 12 months.
NHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as EHC (13). This means that NHC’s stock grew similarly to EHC’s over the last 12 months.
EHC's SMR Rating (41) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NHC (79). This means that EHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NHC’s over the last 12 months.
NHC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as EHC (42). This means that NHC’s stock grew similarly to EHC’s over the last 12 months.
EHC's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NHC (91). This means that EHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NHC’s over the last 12 months.
EHC | NHC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% | 2 days ago60% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago46% | 2 days ago59% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago54% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago59% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago54% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago53% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago0% | 4 days ago61% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago55% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago49% | 2 days ago55% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago41% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EHC has been loosely correlated with UHS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EHC jumps, then UHS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EHC | 100% | +0.08% | ||
UHS - EHC | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.21% | ||
HCA - EHC | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
SGRY - EHC | 44% Loosely correlated | -13.75% | ||
SEM - EHC | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.21% | ||
USPH - EHC | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NHC has been loosely correlated with USPH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NHC jumps, then USPH could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NHC | 100% | -0.60% | ||
USPH - NHC | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
ENSG - NHC | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
SEM - NHC | 39% Loosely correlated | -2.21% | ||
CHE - NHC | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.11% | ||
EHC - NHC | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.08% | ||
More |