EGO
Price
$14.51
Change
-$0.06 (-0.41%)
Updated
Jan 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.86B
34 days until earnings call
SAND
Price
$5.72
Change
+$0.04 (+0.70%)
Updated
Jan 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.56B
32 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EGO vs SAND

Header iconEGO vs SAND Comparison
Open Charts EGO vs SANDBanner chart's image
Eldorado Gold
Price$14.51
Change-$0.06 (-0.41%)
Volume$15.16K
Capitalization2.86B
Sandstorm Gold
Price$5.72
Change+$0.04 (+0.70%)
Volume$52.3K
Capitalization1.56B
EGO vs SAND Comparison Chart
Loading...
EGO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EGO vs. SAND commentary
Jan 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGO is a Hold and SAND is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2025
Stock price -- (EGO: $14.57 vs. SAND: $5.68)
Brand notoriety: EGO and SAND are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EGO: 235% vs. SAND: 93%
Market capitalization -- EGO: $2.86B vs. SAND: $1.56B
EGO [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.86B. SAND’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EGO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSAND’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EGO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SAND’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SAND is a better buy in the long-term than EGO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EGO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAND’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EGO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SAND’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SAND is a better buy in the short-term than EGO.

Price Growth

EGO (@Precious Metals) experienced а -9.22% price change this week, while SAND (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

EGO is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

SAND is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.02% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EGO($2.86B) has a higher market cap than SAND($1.56B). SAND has higher P/E ratio than EGO: SAND (37.43) vs EGO (26.63). SAND YTD gains are higher at: 1.792 vs. EGO (-2.017). EGO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 458M vs. SAND (162M). EGO has more cash in the bank: 544M vs. SAND (14.8M). SAND has less debt than EGO: SAND (435M) vs EGO (659M). EGO has higher revenues than SAND: EGO (1.01B) vs SAND (180M).
EGOSANDEGO / SAND
Capitalization2.86B1.56B184%
EBITDA458M162M283%
Gain YTD-2.0171.792-113%
P/E Ratio26.6337.4371%
Revenue1.01B180M561%
Total Cash544M14.8M3,676%
Total Debt659M435M151%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EGO vs SAND: Fundamental Ratings
EGO
SAND
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6021
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
39100
SMR RATING
1..100
7887
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6049
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAND's Valuation (17) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for EGO (88) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SAND’s stock grew significantly faster than EGO’s over the last 12 months.

EGO's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAND (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that EGO’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAND’s over the last 12 months.

EGO's SMR Rating (78) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SAND (87) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that EGO’s stock grew similarly to SAND’s over the last 12 months.

SAND's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as EGO (60) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SAND’s stock grew similarly to EGO’s over the last 12 months.

EGO's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SAND (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that EGO’s stock grew similarly to SAND’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EGOSAND
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EGO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY591.64-1.14
-0.19%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X99756.910000-747.585940
-0.74%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME27.72-0.24
-0.86%
GameStop Corp
TSLA413.82-14.40
-3.36%
Tesla
AAPL228.26-9.61
-4.04%
Apple

EGO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EGO has been closely correlated with CGAU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EGO jumps, then CGAU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EGO
1D Price
Change %
EGO100%
-2.61%
CGAU - EGO
73%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
CDE - EGO
70%
Closely correlated
-3.13%
SAND - EGO
70%
Closely correlated
-1.39%
NGD - EGO
69%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
IAG - EGO
68%
Closely correlated
+2.06%
More

SAND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAND has been closely correlated with MAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAND jumps, then MAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAND
1D Price
Change %
SAND100%
-1.39%
MAG - SAND
76%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
NGD - SAND
71%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
CDE - SAND
71%
Closely correlated
-3.13%
EGO - SAND
70%
Closely correlated
-2.61%
MTA - SAND
69%
Closely correlated
+1.10%
More