EGO
Price
$25.44
Change
+$0.66 (+2.66%)
Updated
Sep 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.02B
58 days until earnings call
RGLD
Price
$183.03
Change
+$3.45 (+1.92%)
Updated
Sep 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.82B
57 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EGO vs RGLD

Header iconEGO vs RGLD Comparison
Open Charts EGO vs RGLDBanner chart's image
Eldorado Gold
Price$25.44
Change+$0.66 (+2.66%)
Volume$15.01K
Capitalization5.02B
Royal Gold
Price$183.03
Change+$3.45 (+1.92%)
Volume$14.44K
Capitalization11.82B
EGO vs RGLD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EGO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EGO vs. RGLD commentary
Sep 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGO is a StrongBuy and RGLD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 03, 2025
Stock price -- (EGO: $24.78 vs. RGLD: $179.58)
Brand notoriety: EGO and RGLD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EGO: 86% vs. RGLD: 80%
Market capitalization -- EGO: $5.02B vs. RGLD: $11.82B
EGO [@Precious Metals] is valued at $5.02B. RGLD’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $11.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $86.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EGO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRGLD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EGO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RGLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RGLD is a better buy in the long-term than EGO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EGO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGLD’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EGO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RGLD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RGLD is a better buy in the short-term than EGO.

Price Growth

EGO (@Precious Metals) experienced а +5.49% price change this week, while RGLD (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3881.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

EGO is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

RGLD is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.37% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGLD($11.8B) has a higher market cap than EGO($5.02B). RGLD has higher P/E ratio than EGO: RGLD (26.33) vs EGO (12.21). EGO YTD gains are higher at: 66.644 vs. RGLD (37.371). EGO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 813M vs. RGLD (658M). EGO has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. RGLD (248M). RGLD has less debt than EGO: RGLD (50M) vs EGO (1.17B). EGO has higher revenues than RGLD: EGO (1.58B) vs RGLD (799M).
EGORGLDEGO / RGLD
Capitalization5.02B11.8B43%
EBITDA813M658M124%
Gain YTD66.64437.371178%
P/E Ratio12.2126.3346%
Revenue1.58B799M197%
Total Cash1.08B248M435%
Total Debt1.17B50M2,348%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EGO vs RGLD: Fundamental Ratings
EGO
RGLD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3453
SMR RATING
1..100
6955
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3844
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9087
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5026

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGLD's Valuation (19) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for EGO (89). This means that RGLD’s stock grew significantly faster than EGO’s over the last 12 months.

EGO's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as RGLD (53). This means that EGO’s stock grew similarly to RGLD’s over the last 12 months.

RGLD's SMR Rating (55) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as EGO (69). This means that RGLD’s stock grew similarly to EGO’s over the last 12 months.

EGO's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as RGLD (44). This means that EGO’s stock grew similarly to RGLD’s over the last 12 months.

RGLD's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as EGO (90). This means that RGLD’s stock grew similarly to EGO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EGORGLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EGO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TDF11.190.17
+1.54%
Templeton Dragon Fund
RHTX17.40N/A
N/A
RH Tactical Outlook ETF
VETZ19.97N/A
N/A
Academy Veteran Impact ETF
RND28.12N/A
N/A
First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF
DFSU41.35-0.21
-0.51%
Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF

EGO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EGO has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EGO jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EGO
1D Price
Change %
EGO100%
+2.95%
AEM - EGO
78%
Closely correlated
+3.64%
CGAU - EGO
78%
Closely correlated
+4.34%
AGI - EGO
78%
Closely correlated
+2.70%
WPM - EGO
77%
Closely correlated
+3.28%
NGD - EGO
76%
Closely correlated
+3.87%
More

RGLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGLD has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RGLD jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGLD
1D Price
Change %
RGLD100%
+2.02%
AEM - RGLD
81%
Closely correlated
+3.64%
WPM - RGLD
81%
Closely correlated
+3.28%
AGI - RGLD
77%
Closely correlated
+2.70%
FNV - RGLD
76%
Closely correlated
+2.11%
EGO - RGLD
73%
Closely correlated
+2.95%
More