EGO
Price
$28.19
Change
-$0.70 (-2.42%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
5.68B
97 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MMRGF
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.03 (-11.54%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
103.25M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EGO vs MMRGF

Header iconEGO vs MMRGF Comparison
Open Charts EGO vs MMRGFBanner chart's image
Eldorado Gold
Price$28.19
Change-$0.70 (-2.42%)
Volume$1.97M
Capitalization5.68B
Minaurum Gold
Price$0.23
Change-$0.03 (-11.54%)
Volume$588.76K
Capitalization103.25M
EGO vs MMRGF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EGO vs. MMRGF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGO is a Buy and MMRGF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (EGO: $28.19 vs. MMRGF: $0.23)
Brand notoriety: EGO and MMRGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EGO: 87% vs. MMRGF: 115%
Market capitalization -- EGO: $5.68B vs. MMRGF: $103.25M
EGO [@Precious Metals] is valued at $5.68B. MMRGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $103.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $115.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EGO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMMRGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EGO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MMRGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EGO is a better buy in the long-term than MMRGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EGO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMRGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EGO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MMRGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EGO is a better buy in the short-term than MMRGF.

Price Growth

EGO (@Precious Metals) experienced а +7.31% price change this week, while MMRGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +17.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8543.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

EGO is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.93% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EGO($5.68B) has a higher market cap than MMRGF($103M). MMRGF YTD gains are higher at: 127.526 vs. EGO (89.576). EGO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 813M vs. MMRGF (-5.39M). EGO has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. MMRGF (8.37M). EGO has higher revenues than MMRGF: EGO (1.58B) vs MMRGF (0).
EGOMMRGFEGO / MMRGF
Capitalization5.68B103M5,512%
EBITDA813M-5.39M-15,076%
Gain YTD89.576127.52670%
P/E Ratio15.49N/A-
Revenue1.58B0-
Total Cash1.08B8.37M12,885%
Total Debt1.17BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EGO vs MMRGF: Fundamental Ratings
EGO
MMRGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
228
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
29100
SMR RATING
1..100
6897
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3940
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
13100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MMRGF's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as EGO (90) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that MMRGF’s stock grew similarly to EGO’s over the last 12 months.

EGO's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for MMRGF (100) in the null industry. This means that EGO’s stock grew significantly faster than MMRGF’s over the last 12 months.

EGO's SMR Rating (68) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MMRGF (97) in the null industry. This means that EGO’s stock grew similarly to MMRGF’s over the last 12 months.

EGO's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MMRGF (40) in the null industry. This means that EGO’s stock grew similarly to MMRGF’s over the last 12 months.

EGO's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for MMRGF (100) in the null industry. This means that EGO’s stock grew significantly faster than MMRGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EGOMMRGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EGO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MMRGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NPKYY8.46N/A
N/A
Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd.
PBNK19.70N/A
N/A
Pinnacle Bank
DINRF94.55N/A
N/A
Screen Holdings Co., Ltd
MGAG300.00N/A
N/A
Mortgage Oil Corp.
BAMXF98.97N/A
N/A
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG

EGO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EGO has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EGO jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EGO
1D Price
Change %
EGO100%
-2.42%
AEM - EGO
81%
Closely correlated
-2.44%
AGI - EGO
80%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
WPM - EGO
80%
Closely correlated
-1.91%
CGAU - EGO
79%
Closely correlated
-2.25%
IAG - EGO
78%
Closely correlated
-4.44%
More

MMRGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMRGF has been loosely correlated with BTG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MMRGF jumps, then BTG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMRGF
1D Price
Change %
MMRGF100%
+13.57%
BTG - MMRGF
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.70%
NGD - MMRGF
32%
Poorly correlated
+3.84%
PAAS - MMRGF
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.08%
EGO - MMRGF
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.74%
EQX - MMRGF
30%
Poorly correlated
+5.97%
More