Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EGLNX vs SMFPX
EGLNX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EGLNX vs. SMFPX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGLNX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. EGLNX (218M). EGLNX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: EGLNX (4.62) vs SMFPX (3.40). EGLNX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: EGLNX (7 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than EGLNX (1.81). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. EGLNX (32.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than EGLNX: SMFPX (1000) vs EGLNX (10000000). EGLNX (16.93) and SMFPX (16.26) have marching annual gain over last year. EGLNX return over 5 years is better than : 258.10 vs. SMFPX (136.95).
| EGLNX | SMFPX | EGLNX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 2.12 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 2.15 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.982 | 3.485 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 1000 | 1,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218M | 1.28B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.62 | 3.40 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.93 | 16.26 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.65 | 53.06 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 258.10 | 136.95 | 188% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 47.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement