Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EGLNX vs SMFPX
EGLNX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EGLNX vs. SMFPX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGLNX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. EGLNX (227M). EGLNX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: EGLNX (4.83) vs SMFPX (3.19). EGLNX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: EGLNX (7 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than EGLNX (1.67). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. EGLNX (32.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than EGLNX: SMFPX (1000) vs EGLNX (10000000). EGLNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.05 vs. SMFPX (6.78). EGLNX return over 5 years is better than : 245.22 vs. SMFPX (123.81).
| EGLNX | SMFPX | EGLNX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 2.12 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.15 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.894 | 8.213 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 1000 | 1,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 227M | 1.29B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.83 | 3.19 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.05 | 6.78 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 85.38 | 66.05 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 245.22 | 123.81 | 198% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 182.43 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement