Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EGLIX vs SMFPX
EGLIX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EGLIX vs. SMFPX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGLIX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. EGLIX (222M). EGLIX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: EGLIX (4.90) vs SMFPX (3.19). EGLIX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: EGLIX (13 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than EGLIX (1.67). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. EGLIX (32.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than EGLIX: SMFPX (1000) vs EGLIX (100000). EGLIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.97 vs. SMFPX (6.78). EGLIX return over 5 years is better than : 243.10 vs. SMFPX (123.81).
| EGLIX | SMFPX | EGLIX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 2.12 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.15 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.039 | 8.213 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 222M | 1.29B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.90 | 3.19 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.97 | 6.78 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 84.79 | 66.05 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 243.10 | 123.81 | 196% |
| Returns for 10 years | 273.91 | 182.43 | 150% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement