Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EGLCX vs SMRPX
EGLCX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EGLCX vs. SMRPX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGLCX is a Hold and SMRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. EGLCX (216M). SMRPX pays higher dividends than EGLCX: SMRPX (4.50) vs EGLCX (4.00). EGLCX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: EGLCX (13 years) vs SMRPX (10 years). EGLCX (2.67) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.05). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. EGLCX (32.00). EGLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: EGLCX (2500) vs SMRPX (1000000). SMRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.20 vs. EGLCX (-1.79). EGLCX return over 5 years is better than : 217.95 vs. SMRPX (143.30).
| EGLCX | SMRPX | EGLCX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 1.02 | 235% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.67 | 1.05 | 254% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.748 | 5.043 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 216M | 1.25B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.00 | 4.50 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.79 | 1.20 | -149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.49 | 55.24 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 217.95 | 143.30 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 156.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement