Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EGLCX vs SMFPX
EGLCX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EGLCX vs. SMFPX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGLCX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.26B vs. EGLCX (216M). EGLCX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: EGLCX (4.00) vs SMFPX (3.39). EGLCX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: EGLCX (13 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). EGLCX (2.67) is less costly to investors than SMFPX (2.15). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. EGLCX (32.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than EGLCX: SMFPX (1000) vs EGLCX (2500). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.38 vs. EGLCX (-1.79). EGLCX return over 5 years is better than : 217.95 vs. SMFPX (131.43).
| EGLCX | SMFPX | EGLCX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 2.12 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.67 | 2.15 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.748 | 4.284 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 216M | 1.26B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.00 | 3.39 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.79 | 0.38 | -475% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.49 | 50.94 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 217.95 | 131.43 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 156.25 | 124.35 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers