Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EGLCX vs SMFPX
EGLCX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EGLCX vs. SMFPX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGLCX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. EGLCX (222M). EGLCX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: EGLCX (3.97) vs SMFPX (3.19). EGLCX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: EGLCX (13 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). EGLCX (2.67) is less costly to investors than SMFPX (2.15). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. EGLCX (32.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than EGLCX: SMFPX (1000) vs EGLCX (2500). EGLCX (6.82) and SMFPX (6.78) have marching annual gain over last year. EGLCX return over 5 years is better than : 226.19 vs. SMFPX (123.81).
| EGLCX | SMFPX | EGLCX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 2.12 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.67 | 2.15 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.833 | 8.213 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 222M | 1.29B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.97 | 3.19 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.82 | 6.78 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.20 | 66.05 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 226.19 | 123.81 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | 239.20 | 182.43 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement