Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EGLAX vs SMRPX
EGLAX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EGLAX vs. SMRPX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGLAX is a Hold and SMRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. EGLAX (227M). EGLAX pays higher dividends than SMRPX: EGLAX (4.67) vs SMRPX (4.22). EGLAX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: EGLAX (13 years) vs SMRPX (10 years). EGLAX (1.92) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.05). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. EGLAX (32.00). EGLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: EGLAX (2500) vs SMRPX (1000000). EGLAX (7.50) and SMRPX (7.37) have marching annual gain over last year. EGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 236.15 vs. SMRPX (132.83).
| EGLAX | SMRPX | EGLAX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 1.02 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.05 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.180 | 8.220 | 124% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 227M | 1.31B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.67 | 4.22 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.50 | 7.37 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.60 | 70.72 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 236.15 | 132.83 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 265.75 | 213.42 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement