Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EGLAX vs SMFPX
EGLAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EGLAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGLAX is a Buy and SMFPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. EGLAX (223M). EGLAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: EGLAX (4.15) vs SMFPX (3.50). EGLAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: EGLAX (13 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX (2.15) and EGLAX (2.06) have similar cost to investors . SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. EGLAX (41.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than EGLAX: SMFPX (1000) vs EGLAX (2500). EGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.55 vs. SMFPX (23.16). EGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 279.46 vs. SMFPX (146.81).
| EGLAX | SMFPX | EGLAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 2.12 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 2.15 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.694 | 3.391 | 109% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 223M | 1.28B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.15 | 3.50 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.55 | 23.16 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 89.62 | 63.44 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 279.46 | 146.81 | 190% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.73 | 26.38 | 223% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement