Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EGLAX vs SMFPX
EGLAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EGLAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGLAX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. EGLAX (225M). EGLAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: EGLAX (4.46) vs SMFPX (3.42). EGLAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: EGLAX (13 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) and EGLAX (2.06) have similar cost to investors . SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. EGLAX (32.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than EGLAX: SMFPX (1000) vs EGLAX (2500). EGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.61 vs. SMFPX (13.72). EGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 282.25 vs. SMFPX (154.53).
| EGLAX | SMFPX | EGLAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 2.12 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 2.15 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.120 | 3.086 | 101% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 225M | 1.25B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.46 | 3.42 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.61 | 13.72 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.32 | 57.39 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 282.25 | 154.53 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.03 | 55.36 | 172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement