Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EGLAX vs SMFPX
EGLAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EGLAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGLAX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. EGLAX (227M). EGLAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: EGLAX (4.67) vs SMFPX (3.19). EGLAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: EGLAX (13 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than EGLAX (1.92). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. EGLAX (32.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than EGLAX: SMFPX (1000) vs EGLAX (2500). EGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.50 vs. SMFPX (6.49). EGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 236.15 vs. SMFPX (121.41).
| EGLAX | SMFPX | EGLAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 2.12 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 2.15 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.180 | 8.116 | 125% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 227M | 1.31B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.67 | 3.19 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.50 | 6.49 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.60 | 65.90 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 236.15 | 121.41 | 195% |
| Returns for 10 years | 265.75 | 182.18 | 146% |