Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EGLAX vs SMFPX
EGLAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EGLAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGLAX is a Buy and SMFPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. EGLAX (209M). EGLAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: EGLAX (5.05) vs SMFPX (3.55). EGLAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: EGLAX (13 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than EGLAX (1.92). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. EGLAX (32.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than EGLAX: SMFPX (1000) vs EGLAX (2500). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.38 vs. EGLAX (1.50). EGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 261.40 vs. SMFPX (158.15).
| EGLAX | SMFPX | EGLAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 2.12 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 2.15 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.431 | 3.286 | 13% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 209M | 1.24B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.05 | 3.55 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.50 | 3.38 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.43 | 51.57 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 261.40 | 158.15 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.94 | 93.28 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement