EGFEF
Price
$3.75
Change
+$0.11 (+3.02%)
Updated
Nov 11 closing price
Capitalization
13.73B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FBAK
Price
$299.75
Change
-$2.23 (-0.74%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
949.29M
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EGFEF vs FBAK

Header iconEGFEF vs FBAK Comparison
Open Charts EGFEF vs FBAKBanner chart's image
EUROBANK ERGASIAS SVCS AND HOLDINGS SA
Price$3.75
Change+$0.11 (+3.02%)
Volume$295
Capitalization13.73B
First National Bank Alaska
Price$299.75
Change-$2.23 (-0.74%)
Volume$278
Capitalization949.29M
EGFEF vs FBAK Comparison Chart in %
EGFEF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FBAK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EGFEF vs. FBAK commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGFEF is a Hold and FBAK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (EGFEF: $3.75 vs. FBAK: $299.76)
Brand notoriety: EGFEF and FBAK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EGFEF: 60% vs. FBAK: 80%
Market capitalization -- EGFEF: $13.73B vs. FBAK: $949.29M
EGFEF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $13.73B. FBAK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $949.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $157.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EGFEF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFBAK’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • EGFEF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FBAK’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FBAK is a better buy in the long-term than EGFEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EGFEF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FBAK’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EGFEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • FBAK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EGFEF is a better buy in the short-term than FBAK.

Price Growth

EGFEF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FBAK (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

FBAK is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.83% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EGFEF($13.7B) has a higher market cap than FBAK($949M). FBAK has higher P/E ratio than EGFEF: FBAK (15.81) vs EGFEF (8.62). FBAK YTD gains are higher at: 0.002 vs. EGFEF (0.000). FBAK has less debt than EGFEF: FBAK (15M) vs EGFEF (10.2B). EGFEF has higher revenues than FBAK: EGFEF (3.38B) vs FBAK (179M).
EGFEFFBAKEGFEF / FBAK
Capitalization13.7B949M1,444%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.0000.002-
P/E Ratio8.6215.8155%
Revenue3.38B179M1,889%
Total CashN/A87.3M-
Total Debt10.2B15M68,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EGFEF vs FBAK: Fundamental Ratings
EGFEF
FBAK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4415
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
313
SMR RATING
1..100
932
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5145
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1320
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EGFEF's Valuation (78) in the null industry is in the same range as FBAK (92). This means that EGFEF’s stock grew similarly to FBAK’s over the last 12 months.

EGFEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as FBAK (13). This means that EGFEF’s stock grew similarly to FBAK’s over the last 12 months.

EGFEF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as FBAK (32). This means that EGFEF’s stock grew similarly to FBAK’s over the last 12 months.

FBAK's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as EGFEF (51). This means that FBAK’s stock grew similarly to EGFEF’s over the last 12 months.

EGFEF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as FBAK (20). This means that EGFEF’s stock grew similarly to FBAK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EGFEFFBAK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
29%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EGFEF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FBAK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X96929.3300001607.546900
+1.69%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.02N/A
N/A
GameStop Corp
AAPL259.96-1.09
-0.42%
Apple
SPY690.36-3.41
-0.49%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA439.20-8.00
-1.79%
Tesla

EGFEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EGFEF and FCCT have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EGFEF and FCCT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EGFEF
1D Price
Change %
EGFEF100%
N/A
FCCT - EGFEF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MYFW - EGFEF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
JUVF - EGFEF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.02%
HONE - EGFEF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBAK - EGFEF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
More

FBAK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBAK and SGBG have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBAK and SGBG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBAK
1D Price
Change %
FBAK100%
-0.74%
SGBG - FBAK
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ENBP - FBAK
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
EGFEF - FBAK
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCNCB - FBAK
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
FBPA - FBAK
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
More