EFXT
Price
$14.42
Change
+$0.30 (+2.12%)
Updated
Dec 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.72B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
USAC
Price
$24.25
Change
-$0.23 (-0.94%)
Updated
Dec 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3B
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFXT vs USAC

Header iconEFXT vs USAC Comparison
Open Charts EFXT vs USACBanner chart's image
Enerflex
Price$14.42
Change+$0.30 (+2.12%)
Volume$3.19K
Capitalization1.72B
USA Compression Partners
Price$24.25
Change-$0.23 (-0.94%)
Volume$4.17K
Capitalization3B
EFXT vs USAC Comparison Chart in %
EFXT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
USAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFXT vs. USAC commentary
Dec 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFXT is a StrongBuy and USAC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 06, 2025
Stock price -- (EFXT: $14.12 vs. USAC: $24.48)
Brand notoriety: EFXT and USAC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFXT: 86% vs. USAC: 101%
Market capitalization -- EFXT: $1.72B vs. USAC: $3B
EFXT [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $1.72B. USAC’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $56.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFXT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUSAC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EFXT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • USAC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EFXT is a better buy in the long-term than USAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFXT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USAC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFXT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • USAC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, USAC is a better buy in the short-term than EFXT.

Price Growth

EFXT (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +2.39% price change this week, while USAC (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -2.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +3.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFXT is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

USAC is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+3.52% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
USAC($3B) has a higher market cap than EFXT($1.72B). USAC has higher P/E ratio than EFXT: USAC (30.22) vs EFXT (12.84). EFXT YTD gains are higher at: 41.910 vs. USAC (13.226). USAC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 568M vs. EFXT (458M). EFXT has more cash in the bank: 74M vs. USAC (2K). EFXT has less debt than USAC: EFXT (753M) vs USAC (2.52B). EFXT has higher revenues than USAC: EFXT (2.33B) vs USAC (981M).
EFXTUSACEFXT / USAC
Capitalization1.72B3B57%
EBITDA458M568M81%
Gain YTD41.91013.226317%
P/E Ratio12.8430.2242%
Revenue2.33B981M237%
Total Cash74M2K3,700,000%
Total Debt753M2.52B30%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFXT vs USAC: Fundamental Ratings
EFXT
USAC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7619
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2312
SMR RATING
1..100
6210
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3848
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9479
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2890

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EFXT's Valuation (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USAC (86) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that EFXT’s stock grew somewhat faster than USAC’s over the last 12 months.

USAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as EFXT (23) in the null industry. This means that USAC’s stock grew similarly to EFXT’s over the last 12 months.

USAC's SMR Rating (10) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EFXT (62) in the null industry. This means that USAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than EFXT’s over the last 12 months.

EFXT's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as USAC (48) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that EFXT’s stock grew similarly to USAC’s over the last 12 months.

USAC's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as EFXT (94) in the null industry. This means that USAC’s stock grew similarly to EFXT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFXTUSAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFXT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
USAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QUAYX79.241.35
+1.73%
AB Small Cap Growth Advisor
TQSMX25.600.14
+0.55%
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq
FINSX51.51N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor New Insights I
FCVFX35.07N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Value C
NMMGX10.65-0.07
-0.65%
Northern Multi-Manager Glbl Real Estate

EFXT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFXT has been loosely correlated with AROC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EFXT jumps, then AROC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFXT
1D Price
Change %
EFXT100%
+2.77%
AROC - EFXT
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.32%
BKR - EFXT
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
FTI - EFXT
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
WFRD - EFXT
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
VAL - EFXT
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.36%
More

USAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USAC has been loosely correlated with AROC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if USAC jumps, then AROC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USAC
1D Price
Change %
USAC100%
-1.29%
AROC - USAC
66%
Loosely correlated
+2.32%
KGS - USAC
58%
Loosely correlated
+3.18%
OII - USAC
57%
Loosely correlated
+3.81%
BKR - USAC
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
EFXT - USAC
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.77%
More