EFXT
Price
$9.59
Change
-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.18B
80 days until earnings call
TS
Price
$35.61
Change
-$0.44 (-1.22%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
18.94B
72 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFXT vs TS

Header iconEFXT vs TS Comparison
Open Charts EFXT vs TSBanner chart's image
Enerflex
Price$9.59
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Volume$696.56K
Capitalization1.18B
Tenaris S A
Price$35.61
Change-$0.44 (-1.22%)
Volume$788.13K
Capitalization18.94B
EFXT vs TS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EFXT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFXT vs. TS commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFXT is a Hold and TS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (EFXT: $9.59 vs. TS: $35.61)
Brand notoriety: EFXT and TS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFXT: 196% vs. TS: 54%
Market capitalization -- EFXT: $1.18B vs. TS: $18.94B
EFXT [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $1.18B. TS’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $18.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $49.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFXT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EFXT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TS is a better buy in the long-term than EFXT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFXT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFXT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both EFXT and TS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

EFXT (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +5.21% price change this week, while TS (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -0.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFXT is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

TS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-0.68% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TS($18.9B) has a higher market cap than EFXT($1.18B). TS (9.62) and EFXT (9.22) have similar P/E ratio . TS YTD gains are higher at: -2.570 vs. EFXT (-3.668). TS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.08B vs. EFXT (427M). TS has more cash in the bank: 3.06B vs. EFXT (80M). TS has less debt than EFXT: TS (472M) vs EFXT (707M). TS has higher revenues than EFXT: TS (11.8B) vs EFXT (2.33B).
EFXTTSEFXT / TS
Capitalization1.18B18.9B6%
EBITDA427M3.08B14%
Gain YTD-3.668-2.570143%
P/E Ratio9.229.6296%
Revenue2.33B11.8B20%
Total Cash80M3.06B3%
Total Debt707M472M150%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFXT vs TS: Fundamental Ratings
EFXT
TS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
376
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3918
SMR RATING
1..100
7962
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4052
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9813
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4350

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EFXT's Valuation (32) in the null industry is in the same range as TS (47) in the Steel industry. This means that EFXT’s stock grew similarly to TS’s over the last 12 months.

TS's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Steel industry is in the same range as EFXT (39) in the null industry. This means that TS’s stock grew similarly to EFXT’s over the last 12 months.

TS's SMR Rating (62) in the Steel industry is in the same range as EFXT (79) in the null industry. This means that TS’s stock grew similarly to EFXT’s over the last 12 months.

EFXT's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as TS (52) in the Steel industry. This means that EFXT’s stock grew similarly to TS’s over the last 12 months.

TS's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for EFXT (98) in the null industry. This means that TS’s stock grew significantly faster than EFXT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFXTTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFXT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LIAO207.40N/A
N/A
LifeX 2056 Infl-Prt Longevity Inc ETF
XTJA30.25N/A
N/A
Innovator US Equity Acclrtd Pls ETF Jan
HELO63.94-0.05
-0.08%
JPMorgan Hedged Equity Ldrd Ovrly ETF
IEO88.28-0.22
-0.25%
iShares US Oil & Gas Explor & Prod ETF
GSEE52.25-0.60
-1.14%
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emer Mkt Eq ETF

EFXT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFXT has been loosely correlated with PUMP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EFXT jumps, then PUMP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFXT
1D Price
Change %
EFXT100%
-0.16%
PUMP - EFXT
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
AROC - EFXT
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
BKR - EFXT
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
KGS - EFXT
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
TS - EFXT
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.22%
More

TS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TS has been closely correlated with SLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TS jumps, then SLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TS
1D Price
Change %
TS100%
-1.22%
SLB - TS
68%
Closely correlated
-0.69%
BKR - TS
67%
Closely correlated
-1.04%
HAL - TS
67%
Closely correlated
-1.08%
WFRD - TS
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.11%
CHX - TS
65%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More