EFXT
Price
$10.77
Change
+$0.04 (+0.37%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.31B
18 days until earnings call
TS
Price
$34.40
Change
+$0.04 (+0.12%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
18.05B
10 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFXT vs TS

Header iconEFXT vs TS Comparison
Open Charts EFXT vs TSBanner chart's image
Enerflex
Price$10.77
Change+$0.04 (+0.37%)
Volume$484.58K
Capitalization1.31B
Tenaris S A
Price$34.40
Change+$0.04 (+0.12%)
Volume$997.46K
Capitalization18.05B
EFXT vs TS Comparison Chart in %
EFXT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFXT vs. TS commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFXT is a Hold and TS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (EFXT: $10.77 vs. TS: $34.40)
Brand notoriety: EFXT and TS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFXT: 105% vs. TS: 60%
Market capitalization -- EFXT: $1.31B vs. TS: $18.05B
EFXT [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $1.31B. TS’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $18.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $48.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFXT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • EFXT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, TS is a better buy in the long-term than EFXT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFXT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFXT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EFXT is a better buy in the short-term than TS.

Price Growth

EFXT (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -0.09% price change this week, while TS (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +2.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFXT is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

TS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+1.05% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TS($18.1B) has a higher market cap than EFXT($1.31B). EFXT has higher P/E ratio than TS: EFXT (10.36) vs TS (9.30). EFXT YTD gains are higher at: 8.241 vs. TS (-5.880). TS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.08B vs. EFXT (458M). TS has more cash in the bank: 3.06B vs. EFXT (74M). TS has less debt than EFXT: TS (472M) vs EFXT (753M). TS has higher revenues than EFXT: TS (11.8B) vs EFXT (2.33B).
EFXTTSEFXT / TS
Capitalization1.31B18.1B7%
EBITDA458M3.08B15%
Gain YTD8.241-5.880-140%
P/E Ratio10.369.30111%
Revenue2.33B11.8B20%
Total Cash74M3.06B2%
Total Debt753M472M160%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFXT vs TS: Fundamental Ratings
EFXT
TS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7832
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3317
SMR RATING
1..100
6363
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4057
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9817
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a1

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TS's Valuation (23) in the Steel industry is in the same range as EFXT (44) in the null industry. This means that TS’s stock grew similarly to EFXT’s over the last 12 months.

TS's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Steel industry is in the same range as EFXT (33) in the null industry. This means that TS’s stock grew similarly to EFXT’s over the last 12 months.

TS's SMR Rating (63) in the Steel industry is in the same range as EFXT (63) in the null industry. This means that TS’s stock grew similarly to EFXT’s over the last 12 months.

EFXT's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as TS (57) in the Steel industry. This means that EFXT’s stock grew similarly to TS’s over the last 12 months.

TS's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for EFXT (98) in the null industry. This means that TS’s stock grew significantly faster than EFXT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFXTTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFXT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OGLIX108.860.57
+0.53%
Invesco Global R6
JHARX10.600.05
+0.47%
JHancock Multi-Asset Absolute Return R2
PGKAX31.060.04
+0.13%
PGIM Jennison Technology A
BAHAX18.10-0.04
-0.22%
Brown Advisory WMC Strat Eurp Eq Adv
FICVX39.99-0.15
-0.37%
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Secs I

EFXT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFXT has been loosely correlated with PUMP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EFXT jumps, then PUMP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFXT
1D Price
Change %
EFXT100%
+0.37%
PUMP - EFXT
62%
Loosely correlated
+8.20%
BKR - EFXT
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
OII - EFXT
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.48%
VTOL - EFXT
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.32%
TS - EFXT
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
More

TS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TS has been closely correlated with SLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TS jumps, then SLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TS
1D Price
Change %
TS100%
+0.12%
SLB - TS
69%
Closely correlated
-0.88%
HAL - TS
67%
Closely correlated
+2.06%
WFRD - TS
66%
Closely correlated
-1.21%
BKR - TS
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
WHD - TS
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.81%
More