EFXT
Price
$10.05
Change
+$0.05 (+0.50%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.23B
59 days until earnings call
THNPF
Price
$47.44
Change
+$0.55 (+1.17%)
Updated
Aug 18 closing price
Capitalization
8.05B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFXT vs THNPF

Header iconEFXT vs THNPF Comparison
Open Charts EFXT vs THNPFBanner chart's image
Enerflex
Price$10.05
Change+$0.05 (+0.50%)
Volume$1.59K
Capitalization1.23B
Technip Energies
Price$47.44
Change+$0.55 (+1.17%)
Volume$626
Capitalization8.05B
EFXT vs THNPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EFXT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
THNPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFXT vs. THNPF commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFXT is a StrongBuy and THNPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (EFXT: $10.01 vs. THNPF: $47.44)
Brand notoriety: EFXT and THNPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFXT: 67% vs. THNPF: 183%
Market capitalization -- EFXT: $1.23B vs. THNPF: $8.05B
EFXT [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $1.23B. THNPF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $8.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $53.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFXT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTHNPF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EFXT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • THNPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EFXT and THNPF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFXT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while THNPF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFXT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • THNPF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, THNPF is a better buy in the short-term than EFXT.

Price Growth

EFXT (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -0.79% price change this week, while THNPF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFXT is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-0.92% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
THNPF($8.05B) has a higher market cap than EFXT($1.23B). THNPF has higher P/E ratio than EFXT: THNPF (18.41) vs EFXT (9.63). THNPF YTD gains are higher at: 78.025 vs. EFXT (0.603). THNPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 723M vs. EFXT (458M). THNPF has more cash in the bank: 3.88B vs. EFXT (74M). EFXT has less debt than THNPF: EFXT (753M) vs THNPF (987M). THNPF has higher revenues than EFXT: THNPF (7.28B) vs EFXT (2.33B).
EFXTTHNPFEFXT / THNPF
Capitalization1.23B8.05B15%
EBITDA458M723M63%
Gain YTD0.60378.0251%
P/E Ratio9.6318.4152%
Revenue2.33B7.28B32%
Total Cash74M3.88B2%
Total Debt753M987M76%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFXT: Fundamental Ratings
EFXT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
38
SMR RATING
1..100
63
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFXTTHNPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
65%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFXT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
THNPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SGOL34.280.43
+1.27%
abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF
JRE24.17N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson US Real Estate ETF
CPSR24.66N/A
-0.01%
Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - March
FLRT47.40-0.03
-0.06%
Pacer Aristotle Pac Ast Fl Rt Hi Inc ETF
IWLG51.91-0.31
-0.59%
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF

EFXT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFXT has been loosely correlated with AROC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EFXT jumps, then AROC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFXT
1D Price
Change %
EFXT100%
-2.72%
AROC - EFXT
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
KGS - EFXT
54%
Loosely correlated
-3.29%
PUMP - EFXT
54%
Loosely correlated
-3.44%
BKR - EFXT
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.60%
NGS - EFXT
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.21%
More

THNPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, THNPF has been loosely correlated with GZPZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if THNPF jumps, then GZPZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To THNPF
1D Price
Change %
THNPF100%
N/A
GZPZF - THNPF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
THNPY - THNPF
15%
Poorly correlated
-1.51%
WFRD - THNPF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
EFXT - THNPF
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.72%
JUTOY - THNPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More