EFXT
Price
$7.94
Change
+$0.11 (+1.40%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
721.41M
54 days until earnings call
PUMP
Price
$6.45
Change
+$0.19 (+3.04%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
850.86M
52 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFXT vs PUMP

Header iconEFXT vs PUMP Comparison
Open Charts EFXT vs PUMPBanner chart's image
Enerflex
Price$7.94
Change+$0.11 (+1.40%)
Volume$403.44K
Capitalization721.41M
ProPetro Holding
Price$6.45
Change+$0.19 (+3.04%)
Volume$2.26M
Capitalization850.86M
EFXT vs PUMP Comparison Chart
Loading...
EFXT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUMP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFXT vs. PUMP commentary
Jun 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFXT is a StrongBuy and PUMP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2025
Stock price -- (EFXT: $7.94 vs. PUMP: $6.45)
Brand notoriety: EFXT and PUMP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFXT: 102% vs. PUMP: 137%
Market capitalization -- EFXT: $721.41M vs. PUMP: $850.86M
EFXT [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $721.41M. PUMP’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $850.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFXT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePUMP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EFXT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PUMP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EFXT is a better buy in the long-term than PUMP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFXT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PUMP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFXT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PUMP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PUMP is a better buy in the short-term than EFXT.

Price Growth

EFXT (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +4.75% price change this week, while PUMP (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +8.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +5.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFXT is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

PUMP is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+5.43% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PUMP($851M) has a higher market cap than EFXT($721M). EFXT YTD gains are higher at: -20.201 vs. PUMP (-30.868). EFXT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 358M vs. PUMP (302M). EFXT has more cash in the bank: 141M vs. PUMP (41.1M). PUMP has less debt than EFXT: PUMP (149M) vs EFXT (1.32B). EFXT has higher revenues than PUMP: EFXT (3.16B) vs PUMP (1.63B).
EFXTPUMPEFXT / PUMP
Capitalization721M851M85%
EBITDA358M302M119%
Gain YTD-20.201-30.86865%
P/E RatioN/A10.41-
Revenue3.16B1.63B194%
Total Cash141M41.1M343%
Total Debt1.32B149M883%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFXT vs PUMP: Fundamental Ratings
EFXT
PUMP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1614
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5184
SMR RATING
1..100
7993
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4763
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9511
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EFXT's Valuation (39) in the null industry is in the same range as PUMP (68) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that EFXT’s stock grew similarly to PUMP’s over the last 12 months.

EFXT's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PUMP (84) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that EFXT’s stock grew somewhat faster than PUMP’s over the last 12 months.

EFXT's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as PUMP (93) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that EFXT’s stock grew similarly to PUMP’s over the last 12 months.

EFXT's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as PUMP (63) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that EFXT’s stock grew similarly to PUMP’s over the last 12 months.

PUMP's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for EFXT (95) in the null industry. This means that PUMP’s stock grew significantly faster than EFXT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFXTPUMP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFXT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUMP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FFAAX16.58-0.14
-0.84%
Franklin Global Allocation Adv
RMOYX24.63-0.30
-1.20%
Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Y
VWNEX71.34-0.90
-1.25%
Vanguard Windsor™ Admiral™
MCIMX21.87-0.29
-1.31%
Victory Integrity Mid-Cap Value C
AWPAX20.82-0.34
-1.61%
AB Sustainable Intl Thematic A

EFXT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFXT has been loosely correlated with NGS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EFXT jumps, then NGS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFXT
1D Price
Change %
EFXT100%
+1.40%
NGS - EFXT
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
PUMP - EFXT
57%
Loosely correlated
+3.04%
AROC - EFXT
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
FTI - EFXT
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
KGS - EFXT
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
More

PUMP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PUMP has been closely correlated with LBRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PUMP jumps, then LBRT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PUMP
1D Price
Change %
PUMP100%
+3.04%
LBRT - PUMP
82%
Closely correlated
+4.67%
RES - PUMP
79%
Closely correlated
+4.11%
HAL - PUMP
76%
Closely correlated
+5.51%
VTOL - PUMP
72%
Closely correlated
+1.78%
NOV - PUMP
72%
Closely correlated
+2.67%
More