EFXT
Price
$13.74
Change
+$0.14 (+1.03%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.67B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NOA
Price
$14.40
Change
+$0.21 (+1.48%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
419.34M
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFXT vs NOA

Header iconEFXT vs NOA Comparison
Open Charts EFXT vs NOABanner chart's image
Enerflex
Price$13.74
Change+$0.14 (+1.03%)
Volume$388.67K
Capitalization1.67B
North American Construction Group
Price$14.40
Change+$0.21 (+1.48%)
Volume$1.03K
Capitalization419.34M
EFXT vs NOA Comparison Chart in %
EFXT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NOA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFXT vs. NOA commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFXT is a StrongBuy and NOA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (EFXT: $13.59 vs. NOA: $14.18)
Brand notoriety: EFXT and NOA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFXT: 12% vs. NOA: 20%
Market capitalization -- EFXT: $1.7B vs. NOA: $419.34M
EFXT [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $1.7B. NOA’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $419.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $54.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFXT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNOA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EFXT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NOA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EFXT is a better buy in the long-term than NOA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFXT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFXT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NOA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NOA is a better buy in the short-term than EFXT.

Price Growth

EFXT (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -1.06% price change this week, while NOA (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +0.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +3.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFXT is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

NOA is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+3.17% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFXT($1.67B) has a higher market cap than NOA($419M). NOA has higher P/E ratio than EFXT: NOA (15.81) vs EFXT (12.49). EFXT YTD gains are higher at: 36.533 vs. NOA (-34.382). EFXT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 458M vs. NOA (296M). NOA has more cash in the bank: 79M vs. EFXT (74M). EFXT has less debt than NOA: EFXT (753M) vs NOA (884M). EFXT has higher revenues than NOA: EFXT (2.33B) vs NOA (1.25B).
EFXTNOAEFXT / NOA
Capitalization1.67B419M400%
EBITDA458M296M155%
Gain YTD36.533-34.382-106%
P/E Ratio12.4915.8179%
Revenue2.33B1.25B186%
Total Cash74M79M94%
Total Debt753M884M85%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFXT vs NOA: Fundamental Ratings
EFXT
NOA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2267
SMR RATING
1..100
6276
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3763
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9534
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
29n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NOA's Valuation (34) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as EFXT (48) in the null industry. This means that NOA’s stock grew similarly to EFXT’s over the last 12 months.

EFXT's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOA (67) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that EFXT’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOA’s over the last 12 months.

EFXT's SMR Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as NOA (76) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that EFXT’s stock grew similarly to NOA’s over the last 12 months.

EFXT's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as NOA (63) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that EFXT’s stock grew similarly to NOA’s over the last 12 months.

NOA's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EFXT (95) in the null industry. This means that NOA’s stock grew somewhat faster than EFXT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFXTNOA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFXT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NOA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCGSX139.03N/A
N/A
DWS Capital Growth S
ECASX26.31N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap C
IRPSX10.62N/A
N/A
VY® T. Rowe Price Equity Income S
PYEQX24.99N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Equity Income Y
ACEAX10.66N/A
N/A
AB All China Equity A

EFXT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFXT has been loosely correlated with AROC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EFXT jumps, then AROC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFXT
1D Price
Change %
EFXT100%
-2.69%
AROC - EFXT
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
BKR - EFXT
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.34%
FTI - EFXT
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
WFRD - EFXT
60%
Loosely correlated
-3.30%
VAL - EFXT
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.15%
More

NOA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOA has been loosely correlated with EFXT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOA jumps, then EFXT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOA
1D Price
Change %
NOA100%
-1.32%
EFXT - NOA
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.69%
WFRD - NOA
47%
Loosely correlated
-3.30%
HLX - NOA
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.64%
SLB - NOA
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
OII - NOA
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
More