EFXT
Price
$15.88
Change
+$0.24 (+1.53%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
1.93B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HAL
Price
$29.12
Change
+$0.08 (+0.28%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
24.51B
46 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFXT vs HAL

Header iconEFXT vs HAL Comparison
Open Charts EFXT vs HALBanner chart's image
Enerflex
Price$15.88
Change+$0.24 (+1.53%)
Volume$382.36K
Capitalization1.93B
Halliburton
Price$29.12
Change+$0.08 (+0.28%)
Volume$9.68M
Capitalization24.51B
EFXT vs HAL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFXT vs. HAL commentary
Dec 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFXT is a StrongBuy and HAL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2025
Stock price -- (EFXT: $15.88 vs. HAL: $29.12)
Brand notoriety: EFXT: Not notable vs. HAL: Notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFXT: 74% vs. HAL: 80%
Market capitalization -- EFXT: $1.93B vs. HAL: $24.51B
EFXT [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $1.93B. HAL’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $24.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $60.26B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFXT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHAL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EFXT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HAL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EFXT and HAL are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFXT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFXT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HAL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both EFXT and HAL are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

EFXT (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +12.46% price change this week, while HAL (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +4.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -0.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFXT is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

HAL is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-0.45% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAL($24.5B) has a higher market cap than EFXT($1.93B). HAL has higher P/E ratio than EFXT: HAL (19.28) vs EFXT (14.44). EFXT YTD gains are higher at: 59.598 vs. HAL (9.583). HAL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.99B vs. EFXT (458M). HAL has more cash in the bank: 2.04B vs. EFXT (74M). EFXT has less debt than HAL: EFXT (753M) vs HAL (8.56B). HAL has higher revenues than EFXT: HAL (22.2B) vs EFXT (2.33B).
EFXTHALEFXT / HAL
Capitalization1.93B24.5B8%
EBITDA458M3.99B11%
Gain YTD59.5989.583622%
P/E Ratio14.4419.2875%
Revenue2.33B22.2B10%
Total Cash74M2.04B4%
Total Debt753M8.56B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFXT vs HAL: Fundamental Ratings
EFXT
HAL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7727
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1856
SMR RATING
1..100
6248
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3723
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
939
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a42

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EFXT's Valuation (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAL (92) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that EFXT’s stock grew somewhat faster than HAL’s over the last 12 months.

EFXT's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAL (56) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that EFXT’s stock grew somewhat faster than HAL’s over the last 12 months.

HAL's SMR Rating (48) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as EFXT (62) in the null industry. This means that HAL’s stock grew similarly to EFXT’s over the last 12 months.

HAL's Price Growth Rating (23) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as EFXT (37) in the null industry. This means that HAL’s stock grew similarly to EFXT’s over the last 12 months.

HAL's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for EFXT (93) in the null industry. This means that HAL’s stock grew significantly faster than EFXT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFXTHAL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
64%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFXT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HAL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMDYX14.010.13
+0.94%
Columbia Mid Cap Index Inst3
JEASX17.710.14
+0.80%
Janus Henderson Global Sust Eq A
TOLCX16.360.09
+0.55%
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure C
RMYSX10.270.04
+0.39%
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income S
SSSVX518.761.07
+0.21%
State Street Equity 500 Index A

EFXT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFXT has been loosely correlated with AROC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EFXT jumps, then AROC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFXT
1D Price
Change %
EFXT100%
+1.53%
AROC - EFXT
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
BKR - EFXT
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.21%
FTI - EFXT
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
WFRD - EFXT
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
OII - EFXT
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.35%
More

HAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAL has been closely correlated with SLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAL jumps, then SLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAL
1D Price
Change %
HAL100%
+0.28%
SLB - HAL
83%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
WFRD - HAL
78%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
NOV - HAL
77%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
RES - HAL
74%
Closely correlated
-0.85%
WHD - HAL
72%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
More