EFV | ICOW | EFV / ICOW | |
Gain YTD | 21.708 | 18.246 | 119% |
Net Assets | 25.7B | 1.14B | 2,256% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.65 | 51% |
Turnover | 28.00 | 67.00 | 42% |
Yield | 3.85 | 4.44 | 87% |
Fund Existence | 20 years | 8 years | - |
EFV | ICOW | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago84% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago83% | 4 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago80% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago79% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFV has been closely correlated with BBVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFV jumps, then BBVA could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOW has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOW jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ICOW | 100% | -0.35% | ||
BHP - ICOW | 74% Closely correlated | -2.53% | ||
TTE - ICOW | 72% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
RIO - ICOW | 71% Closely correlated | -1.16% | ||
SHEL - ICOW | 70% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
WDS - ICOW | 69% Closely correlated | +5.43% | ||
More |