EFSCP
Price
$20.45
Change
+$0.15 (+0.74%)
Updated
Jul 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
HBANP
Price
$17.56
Change
-$0.07 (-0.40%)
Updated
Jul 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFSCP vs HBANP

Header iconEFSCP vs HBANP Comparison
Open Charts EFSCP vs HBANPBanner chart's image
Enterprise Financial Services
Price$20.45
Change+$0.15 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Huntington Bancshares
Price$17.56
Change-$0.07 (-0.40%)
Volume$112
CapitalizationN/A
EFSCP vs HBANP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EFSCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBANP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFSCP vs. HBANP commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFSCP is a Hold and HBANP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (EFSCP: $20.30 vs. HBANP: $17.63)
Brand notoriety: EFSCP and HBANP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFSCP: 20% vs. HBANP: 26%
Market capitalization -- EFSCP: $0 vs. HBANP: $0
EFSCP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. HBANP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFSCP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHBANP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EFSCP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HBANP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EFSCP is a better buy in the long-term than HBANP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFSCP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HBANP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFSCP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • HBANP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EFSCP is a better buy in the short-term than HBANP.

Price Growth

EFSCP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.73% price change this week, while HBANP (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.56%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFSCP YTD gains are higher at: 6.234 vs. HBANP (2.775). HBANP has more cash in the bank: 1.56B vs. EFSCP (193M). EFSCP has less debt than HBANP: EFSCP (204M) vs HBANP (12.4B). HBANP has higher revenues than EFSCP: HBANP (7.36B) vs EFSCP (550M).
EFSCPHBANPEFSCP / HBANP
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.2342.775225%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue550M7.36B7%
Total Cash193M1.56B12%
Total Debt204M12.4B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HBANP: Fundamental Ratings
HBANP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFSCPHBANP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
42%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
29%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFSCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBANP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HIFS285.159.94
+3.61%
Hingham Institution for Savings
WSBC33.701.00
+3.06%
WesBanco
LBRDK100.561.27
+1.28%
Liberty Broadband Corp
IRD1.000.01
+1.01%
Opus Genetics Inc
SLNHP3.88-0.13
-3.12%
Soluna Holdings

EFSCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EFSCP and HBANP have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EFSCP and HBANP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFSCP
1D Price
Change %
EFSCP100%
+1.02%
HBANP - EFSCP
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WSBCP - EFSCP
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
FCCO - EFSCP
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
VLYPO - EFSCP
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
WAFDP - EFSCP
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
More

HBANP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBANP has been closely correlated with FITBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBANP jumps, then FITBO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBANP
1D Price
Change %
HBANP100%
N/A
FITBO - HBANP
68%
Closely correlated
+1.39%
HBANL - HBANP
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
OZKAP - HBANP
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
TCBIO - HBANP
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
FCNCP - HBANP
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
More