EFSCP
Price
$20.36
Change
-$0.31 (-1.50%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:07 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FLG
Price
$12.98
Change
+$0.12 (+0.93%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.35B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFSCP vs FLG

Header iconEFSCP vs FLG Comparison
Open Charts EFSCP vs FLGBanner chart's image
Enterprise Financial Services
Price$20.36
Change-$0.31 (-1.50%)
Volume$400
CapitalizationN/A
Flagstar Bank National Association
Price$12.98
Change+$0.12 (+0.93%)
Volume$75.67K
Capitalization5.35B
EFSCP vs FLG Comparison Chart in %
EFSCP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FLG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFSCP vs. FLG commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFSCP is a Hold and FLG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (EFSCP: $20.67 vs. FLG: $12.86)
Brand notoriety: EFSCP and FLG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFSCP: 34% vs. FLG: 100%
Market capitalization -- EFSCP: $0 vs. FLG: $5.35B
EFSCP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. FLG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $157.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFSCP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFLG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EFSCP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FLG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLG is a better buy in the long-term than EFSCP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFSCP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFSCP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FLG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both EFSCP and FLG are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

EFSCP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.25% price change this week, while FLG (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLG is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.83% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFSCP YTD gains are higher at: 6.706 vs. FLG (2.145). EFSCP has less debt than FLG: EFSCP (668M) vs FLG (13.2B). FLG has higher revenues than EFSCP: FLG (2.04B) vs EFSCP (593M).
EFSCPFLGEFSCP / FLG
CapitalizationN/A5.35B-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.7062.145313%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue593M2.04B29%
Total Cash260MN/A-
Total Debt668M13.2B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLG: Fundamental Ratings
FLG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
61
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
82
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFSCPFLG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFSCP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FLG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AVPAX23.270.14
+0.61%
American Beacon Small Cp Val Inv
REMCX20.020.07
+0.35%
Russell Inv Emerging Markets C
CMJIX45.290.07
+0.15%
Calvert US Mid Cap Core Rspnb Idx I
SMCFX78.730.03
+0.04%
American Funds SMALLCAP World F2
SCJKX8.06-0.04
-0.49%
Steward Covered Call Income R6

EFSCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFSCP has been loosely correlated with FLG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EFSCP jumps, then FLG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFSCP
1D Price
Change %
EFSCP100%
+0.34%
FLG - EFSCP
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
MYFW - EFSCP
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
ESQ - EFSCP
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
OPBK - EFSCP
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
EFSC - EFSCP
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
More

FLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLG has been closely correlated with FRME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLG jumps, then FRME could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLG
1D Price
Change %
FLG100%
+0.39%
FRME - FLG
67%
Closely correlated
+1.61%
VLY - FLG
66%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
BKU - FLG
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
BY - FLG
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.16%
WBS - FLG
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.23%
More