EFSC
Price
$60.39
Change
-$0.28 (-0.46%)
Updated
Sep 8, 12:48 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.24B
49 days until earnings call
QNBC
Price
$35.59
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
132.44M
50 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFSC vs QNBC

Header iconEFSC vs QNBC Comparison
Open Charts EFSC vs QNBCBanner chart's image
Enterprise Financial Services
Price$60.39
Change-$0.28 (-0.46%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.24B
QNB
Price$35.59
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.28K
Capitalization132.44M
EFSC vs QNBC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QNBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFSC vs. QNBC commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFSC is a Buy and QNBC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (EFSC: $60.67 vs. QNBC: $35.59)
Brand notoriety: EFSC and QNBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFSC: 89% vs. QNBC: 231%
Market capitalization -- EFSC: $2.24B vs. QNBC: $132.44M
EFSC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.24B. QNBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $132.44M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFSC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileQNBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EFSC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • QNBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EFSC is a better buy in the long-term than QNBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFSC’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QNBC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFSC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QNBC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EFSC is a better buy in the short-term than QNBC.

Price Growth

EFSC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.93% price change this week, while QNBC (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFSC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

QNBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.14% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFSC($2.24B) has a higher market cap than QNBC($132M). EFSC has higher P/E ratio than QNBC: EFSC (11.53) vs QNBC (10.23). EFSC YTD gains are higher at: 8.769 vs. QNBC (7.248). EFSC has more cash in the bank: 260M vs. QNBC (17.7M). QNBC has less debt than EFSC: QNBC (107M) vs EFSC (661M). EFSC has higher revenues than QNBC: EFSC (552M) vs QNBC (53.1M).
EFSCQNBCEFSC / QNBC
Capitalization2.24B132M1,700%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.7697.248121%
P/E Ratio11.5310.23113%
Revenue552M53.1M1,040%
Total Cash260M17.7M1,469%
Total Debt661M107M618%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFSC vs QNBC: Fundamental Ratings
EFSC
QNBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3042
SMR RATING
1..100
1550
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4652
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4678
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QNBC's Valuation (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EFSC (59) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that QNBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as QNBC (42) in the null industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to QNBC’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QNBC (50) in the null industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew somewhat faster than QNBC’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as QNBC (52) in the null industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to QNBC’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as QNBC (78) in the null industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to QNBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFSCQNBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
55%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QNBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JGMNX28.880.17
+0.59%
Janus Henderson Triton N
RPGIX22.970.12
+0.53%
T. Rowe Price Global Industrials
SRORX13.650.02
+0.15%
Calamos Antetokounmpo Sustainable Eqs R6
MGOCX34.19-0.09
-0.26%
NYLI WMC Enduring Capital Class C
FGINX16.73-0.06
-0.36%
Macquarie Growth and Income A

EFSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFSC has been closely correlated with WSFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFSC jumps, then WSFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFSC
1D Price
Change %
EFSC100%
-0.83%
WSFS - EFSC
91%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
GABC - EFSC
91%
Closely correlated
-1.05%
STBA - EFSC
90%
Closely correlated
-0.93%
SBCF - EFSC
90%
Closely correlated
-0.95%
FNB - EFSC
90%
Closely correlated
-1.85%
More

QNBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QNBC has been loosely correlated with FUNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QNBC jumps, then FUNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QNBC
1D Price
Change %
QNBC100%
N/A
FUNC - QNBC
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
PSBQ - QNBC
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.48%
EFSC - QNBC
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
HVLM - QNBC
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ISTR - QNBC
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
More