EFSC
Price
$56.71
Change
-$0.47 (-0.82%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
2.1B
43 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NBHC
Price
$39.90
Change
+$0.10 (+0.25%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
1.51B
44 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFSC vs NBHC

Header iconEFSC vs NBHC Comparison
Open Charts EFSC vs NBHCBanner chart's image
Enterprise Financial Services
Price$56.71
Change-$0.47 (-0.82%)
Volume$316.01K
Capitalization2.1B
NATIONAL BANK HOLDINGS
Price$39.90
Change+$0.10 (+0.25%)
Volume$349.29K
Capitalization1.51B
EFSC vs NBHC Comparison Chart in %
EFSC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NBHC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFSC vs. NBHC commentary
Dec 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFSC is a StrongBuy and NBHC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 14, 2025
Stock price -- (EFSC: $57.18 vs. NBHC: $39.80)
Brand notoriety: EFSC and NBHC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFSC: 107% vs. NBHC: 108%
Market capitalization -- EFSC: $2.1B vs. NBHC: $1.51B
EFSC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.1B. NBHC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFSC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNBHC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EFSC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NBHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EFSC and NBHC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFSC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NBHC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFSC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NBHC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EFSC is a better buy in the short-term than NBHC.

Price Growth

EFSC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.62% price change this week, while NBHC (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFSC is expected to report earnings on Jan 26, 2026.

NBHC is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFSC($2.1B) has a higher market cap than NBHC($1.51B). NBHC has higher P/E ratio than EFSC: NBHC (12.67) vs EFSC (11.05). EFSC YTD gains are higher at: 3.040 vs. NBHC (-5.438). NBHC has more cash in the bank: 369M vs. EFSC (253M). NBHC has less debt than EFSC: NBHC (54.7M) vs EFSC (668M). EFSC has higher revenues than NBHC: EFSC (593M) vs NBHC (412M).
EFSCNBHCEFSC / NBHC
Capitalization2.1B1.51B139%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.040-5.438-56%
P/E Ratio11.0512.6787%
Revenue593M412M144%
Total Cash253M369M69%
Total Debt668M54.7M1,221%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFSC vs NBHC: Fundamental Ratings
EFSC
NBHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6526
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3764
SMR RATING
1..100
1520
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5252
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6262
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NBHC's Valuation (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (51). This means that NBHC’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (64). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (20). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (52). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (62). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFSCNBHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFSC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NBHC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JGEMX13.780.12
+0.88%
JHancock Global Equity R6
RIVHX20.590.06
+0.29%
American Funds International Vntg R-2E
GCPYX22.330.04
+0.18%
Gateway Equity Call Premium Y
FNILX24.80N/A
N/A
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index
BCISX17.04N/A
N/A
Brown Capital Mgmt Intl All Com Instl

EFSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFSC has been closely correlated with WSFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFSC jumps, then WSFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFSC
1D Price
Change %
EFSC100%
-0.30%
WSFS - EFSC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.91%
BUSE - EFSC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
UCB - EFSC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
SBCF - EFSC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
HWC - EFSC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
More

NBHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NBHC has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NBHC jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBHC
1D Price
Change %
NBHC100%
+0.18%
UCB - NBHC
82%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
STBA - NBHC
82%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
PFS - NBHC
82%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
TRMK - NBHC
82%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
EFSC - NBHC
82%
Closely correlated
-0.30%
More