EFSC
Price
$55.86
Change
+$1.10 (+2.01%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.07B
53 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MPB
Price
$29.99
Change
+$0.70 (+2.39%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
679.93M
55 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFSC vs MPB

Header iconEFSC vs MPB Comparison
Open Charts EFSC vs MPBBanner chart's image
Enterprise Financial Services
Price$55.86
Change+$1.10 (+2.01%)
Volume$186.68K
Capitalization2.07B
Mid Penn Ban
Price$29.99
Change+$0.70 (+2.39%)
Volume$1.35K
Capitalization679.93M
EFSC vs MPB Comparison Chart in %
EFSC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MPB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFSC vs. MPB commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFSC is a Hold and MPB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (EFSC: $54.79 vs. MPB: $29.31)
Brand notoriety: EFSC and MPB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFSC: 15% vs. MPB: 21%
Market capitalization -- EFSC: $2.04B vs. MPB: $679.93M
EFSC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.04B. MPB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $679.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFSC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMPB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EFSC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MPB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MPB is a better buy in the long-term than EFSC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFSC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MPB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFSC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MPB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MPB is a better buy in the short-term than EFSC.

Price Growth

EFSC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.03% price change this week, while MPB (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFSC is expected to report earnings on Jan 26, 2026.

MPB is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.92% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFSC($2.07B) has a higher market cap than MPB($680M). MPB has higher P/E ratio than EFSC: MPB (12.21) vs EFSC (10.89). MPB YTD gains are higher at: 4.576 vs. EFSC (-1.267). EFSC has more cash in the bank: 253M vs. MPB (52.7M). MPB has less debt than EFSC: MPB (76M) vs EFSC (661M). EFSC has higher revenues than MPB: EFSC (552M) vs MPB (208M).
EFSCMPBEFSC / MPB
Capitalization2.07B680M304%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.2674.576-28%
P/E Ratio10.8912.2189%
Revenue552M208M265%
Total Cash253M52.7M480%
Total Debt661M76M870%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFSC vs MPB: Fundamental Ratings
EFSC
MPB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3549
SMR RATING
1..100
1534
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5854
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6430
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5049

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MPB's Valuation (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (52). This means that MPB’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MPB (49). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to MPB’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MPB (34). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to MPB’s over the last 12 months.

MPB's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (58). This means that MPB’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

MPB's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EFSC (64). This means that MPB’s stock grew somewhat faster than EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFSCMPB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
55%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFSC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MPB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SBIEX13.64N/A
N/A
ClearBridge International Value A
EITGX61.43N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Tx-Mgd Growth 1.2 I
KTRSX9.76N/A
N/A
DWS Global Income Builder S
CLWFX90.11N/A
N/A
Columbia Cornerstone Growth Inst 2
GEMQX14.74N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Emerging Mkts Eq ex. Chn R

EFSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFSC has been closely correlated with WSFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFSC jumps, then WSFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFSC
1D Price
Change %
EFSC100%
-0.67%
WSFS - EFSC
88%
Closely correlated
-1.37%
BUSE - EFSC
87%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
SBCF - EFSC
87%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
UCB - EFSC
87%
Closely correlated
-0.81%
HWC - EFSC
86%
Closely correlated
-0.56%
More

MPB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPB has been closely correlated with UVSP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MPB jumps, then UVSP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MPB
1D Price
Change %
MPB100%
-0.81%
UVSP - MPB
84%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
CVBF - MPB
79%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
EFSC - MPB
78%
Closely correlated
-0.67%
HFWA - MPB
78%
Closely correlated
-0.46%
FCF - MPB
78%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
More