EFSC
Price
$58.84
Change
+$0.22 (+0.38%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.18B
29 days until earnings call
MOFG
Price
$28.82
Change
+$0.12 (+0.42%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
596.75M
25 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFSC vs MOFG

Header iconEFSC vs MOFG Comparison
Open Charts EFSC vs MOFGBanner chart's image
Enterprise Financial Services
Price$58.84
Change+$0.22 (+0.38%)
Volume$101.77K
Capitalization2.18B
MidWestOne Financial Gp
Price$28.82
Change+$0.12 (+0.42%)
Volume$71.69K
Capitalization596.75M
EFSC vs MOFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MOFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFSC vs. MOFG commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFSC is a StrongBuy and MOFG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (EFSC: $58.84 vs. MOFG: $28.82)
Brand notoriety: EFSC and MOFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFSC: 64% vs. MOFG: 57%
Market capitalization -- EFSC: $2.18B vs. MOFG: $596.75M
EFSC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.18B. MOFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $596.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFSC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMOFG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EFSC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MOFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EFSC is a better buy in the long-term than MOFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFSC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MOFG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFSC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MOFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MOFG is a better buy in the short-term than EFSC.

Price Growth

EFSC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.44% price change this week, while MOFG (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFSC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

MOFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFSC($2.18B) has a higher market cap than MOFG($597M). MOFG has higher P/E ratio than EFSC: MOFG (13.95) vs EFSC (11.19). EFSC YTD gains are higher at: 6.031 vs. MOFG (1.426). EFSC has more cash in the bank: 253M vs. MOFG (78.7M). MOFG has less debt than EFSC: MOFG (112M) vs EFSC (661M).
EFSCMOFGEFSC / MOFG
Capitalization2.18B597M364%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.0311.426423%
P/E Ratio11.1913.9580%
RevenueN/A84.7M-
Total Cash253M78.7M321%
Total Debt661M112M590%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFSC vs MOFG: Fundamental Ratings
EFSC
MOFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5252
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3050
SMR RATING
1..100
1568
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5359
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4610
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EFSC's Valuation (56) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MOFG (91). This means that EFSC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MOFG’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MOFG (50). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to MOFG’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MOFG (68). This means that EFSC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MOFG’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MOFG (59). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to MOFG’s over the last 12 months.

MOFG's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EFSC (46). This means that MOFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFSCMOFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MOFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OEGNX26.100.22
+0.85%
Invesco Discovery Mid Cap Growth R
SPMCX8.210.05
+0.61%
Saratoga Mid Capitalization C
AAIPX18.840.11
+0.59%
American Beacon International Eq Inv
OMSYX32.370.18
+0.56%
Invesco Main Street All Cap Y
HRITX15.52-0.07
-0.45%
Hood River International Opportunity Ret

EFSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFSC has been closely correlated with WSFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFSC jumps, then WSFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFSC
1D Price
Change %
EFSC100%
+0.38%
WSFS - EFSC
91%
Closely correlated
-0.02%
GABC - EFSC
91%
Closely correlated
-0.05%
SBCF - EFSC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
STBA - EFSC
90%
Closely correlated
N/A
FNB - EFSC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
More

MOFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOFG has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MOFG jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MOFG
1D Price
Change %
MOFG100%
+0.42%
FMBH - MOFG
87%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
SRCE - MOFG
86%
Closely correlated
+0.74%
BBT - MOFG
86%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
PEBO - MOFG
86%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
EFSC - MOFG
85%
Closely correlated
+0.38%
More