EFSC
Price
$55.80
Change
+$0.77 (+1.40%)
Updated
Jan 15, 11:19 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.04B
11 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MCB
Price
$82.29
Change
+$1.11 (+1.37%)
Updated
Jan 15, 11:37 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
835.99M
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFSC vs MCB

Header iconEFSC vs MCB Comparison
Open Charts EFSC vs MCBBanner chart's image
Enterprise Financial Services
Price$55.80
Change+$0.77 (+1.40%)
Volume$200
Capitalization2.04B
Metropolitan Bank Holding
Price$82.29
Change+$1.11 (+1.37%)
Volume$654
Capitalization835.99M
EFSC vs MCB Comparison Chart in %
EFSC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MCB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFSC vs. MCB commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFSC is a Hold and MCB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (EFSC: $55.03 vs. MCB: $81.18)
Brand notoriety: EFSC and MCB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFSC: 86% vs. MCB: 69%
Market capitalization -- EFSC: $2.04B vs. MCB: $835.99M
EFSC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.04B. MCB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $835.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $157.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFSC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EFSC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MCB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EFSC is a better buy in the long-term than MCB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFSC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFSC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MCB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCB is a better buy in the short-term than EFSC.

Price Growth

EFSC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.23% price change this week, while MCB (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFSC is expected to report earnings on Jan 26, 2026.

MCB is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.84% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFSC($2.04B) has a higher market cap than MCB($836M). MCB has higher P/E ratio than EFSC: MCB (14.04) vs EFSC (10.73). MCB YTD gains are higher at: 6.312 vs. EFSC (1.907). EFSC has more cash in the bank: 208M vs. MCB (13.6M). MCB has less debt than EFSC: MCB (292M) vs EFSC (668M). EFSC has higher revenues than MCB: EFSC (593M) vs MCB (298M).
EFSCMCBEFSC / MCB
Capitalization2.04B836M244%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.9076.31230%
P/E Ratio10.7314.0476%
Revenue593M298M199%
Total Cash208M13.6M1,529%
Total Debt668M292M229%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFSC vs MCB: Fundamental Ratings
EFSC
MCB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5361
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4467
SMR RATING
1..100
1523
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6050
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6626
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EFSC's Valuation (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCB (63) in the Major Banks industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to MCB’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCB (67) in the Major Banks industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to MCB’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCB (23) in the Major Banks industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to MCB’s over the last 12 months.

MCB's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (60) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCB’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

MCB's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EFSC (66) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFSCMCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFSC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MCB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FERRX13.530.15
+1.12%
First Eagle Global Real Assets R6
CMCIX25.540.16
+0.63%
Calvert Small/Mid-Cap I
IYPCX21.530.01
+0.05%
Nomura Systematic Emerging Markets Eq R
AIECX17.26-0.04
-0.23%
Invesco EQV International Equity C
PIGFX33.39-0.29
-0.86%
Victory Pioneer Fundamental Growth A

EFSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFSC has been closely correlated with WSFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFSC jumps, then WSFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFSC
1D Price
Change %
EFSC100%
+1.33%
WSFS - EFSC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
BUSE - EFSC
87%
Closely correlated
+2.11%
UCB - EFSC
87%
Closely correlated
+2.80%
SBCF - EFSC
86%
Closely correlated
+1.45%
GABC - EFSC
86%
Closely correlated
+1.97%
More

MCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCB has been closely correlated with EFSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCB jumps, then EFSC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCB
1D Price
Change %
MCB100%
+1.81%
EFSC - MCB
78%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
WSFS - MCB
78%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
TRMK - MCB
77%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
SSB - MCB
77%
Closely correlated
+1.16%
ASB - MCB
77%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
More