EFSC
Price
$56.90
Change
-$0.62 (-1.08%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.1B
70 days until earnings call
KTHN
Price
$26.00
Change
+$0.75 (+2.97%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
82.72M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFSC vs KTHN

Header iconEFSC vs KTHN Comparison
Open Charts EFSC vs KTHNBanner chart's image
Enterprise Financial Services
Price$56.90
Change-$0.62 (-1.08%)
Volume$299.16K
Capitalization2.1B
Katahdin Bankshares
Price$26.00
Change+$0.75 (+2.97%)
Volume$1.29K
Capitalization82.72M
EFSC vs KTHN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KTHN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFSC vs. KTHN commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFSC is a Hold and KTHN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (EFSC: $56.90 vs. KTHN: $26.00)
Brand notoriety: EFSC and KTHN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFSC: 161% vs. KTHN: 57%
Market capitalization -- EFSC: $2.1B vs. KTHN: $82.72M
EFSC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.1B. KTHN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $82.72M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFSC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKTHN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • EFSC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • KTHN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, KTHN is a better buy in the long-term than EFSC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFSC’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KTHN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFSC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KTHN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EFSC is a better buy in the short-term than KTHN.

Price Growth

EFSC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.14% price change this week, while KTHN (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFSC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFSC($2.11B) has a higher market cap than KTHN($82.7M). EFSC has higher P/E ratio than KTHN: EFSC (10.82) vs KTHN (9.59). KTHN YTD gains are higher at: 5.784 vs. EFSC (2.010). EFSC has more cash in the bank: 260M vs. KTHN (9.02M). KTHN has less debt than EFSC: KTHN (30M) vs EFSC (661M).
EFSCKTHNEFSC / KTHN
Capitalization2.11B82.7M2,545%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.0105.78435%
P/E Ratio10.829.59113%
Revenue552MN/A-
Total Cash260M9.02M2,882%
Total Debt661M30M2,203%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFSC vs KTHN: Fundamental Ratings
EFSC
KTHN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5031
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3121
SMR RATING
1..100
1558
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5547
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5229
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KTHN's Valuation (30) in the null industry is in the same range as EFSC (57) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KTHN’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

KTHN's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as EFSC (31) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KTHN’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KTHN (58) in the null industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew somewhat faster than KTHN’s over the last 12 months.

KTHN's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as EFSC (55) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KTHN’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

KTHN's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is in the same range as EFSC (52) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KTHN’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFSCKTHN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
16%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
37%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KTHN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DSITF1.530.07
+4.79%
CURRYS PLC
BYDDY14.390.03
+0.21%
BYD Co., Ltd.
KIKOY18.64N/A
N/A
Kikkoman Corp.
WMLLF0.04N/A
N/A
Wealth Minerals Ltd.
SCEYF9.30-0.18
-1.89%
Source Energy Services Ltd.

EFSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFSC has been closely correlated with GABC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFSC jumps, then GABC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFSC
1D Price
Change %
EFSC100%
-1.08%
GABC - EFSC
91%
Closely correlated
-1.75%
STBA - EFSC
90%
Closely correlated
-2.29%
SBCF - EFSC
90%
Closely correlated
-1.61%
FNB - EFSC
90%
Closely correlated
-1.63%
BY - EFSC
89%
Closely correlated
-1.64%
More

KTHN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KTHN and FUNC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KTHN and FUNC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KTHN
1D Price
Change %
KTHN100%
N/A
FUNC - KTHN
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
EFSC - KTHN
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
BHRB - KTHN
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
QNBC - KTHN
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NBTB - KTHN
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.21%
More