EFSC
Price
$56.09
Change
-$0.13 (-0.23%)
Updated
Jan 16, 11:20 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.08B
10 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KTHN
Price
$29.00
Change
+$0.20 (+0.69%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
92.26M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFSC vs KTHN

Header iconEFSC vs KTHN Comparison
Open Charts EFSC vs KTHNBanner chart's image
Enterprise Financial Services
Price$56.09
Change-$0.13 (-0.23%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.08B
Katahdin Bankshares
Price$29.00
Change+$0.20 (+0.69%)
Volume$7.85K
Capitalization92.26M
EFSC vs KTHN Comparison Chart in %
EFSC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KTHN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFSC vs. KTHN commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFSC is a Hold and KTHN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (EFSC: $56.21 vs. KTHN: $29.00)
Brand notoriety: EFSC and KTHN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFSC: 78% vs. KTHN: 353%
Market capitalization -- EFSC: $2.08B vs. KTHN: $92.26M
EFSC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.08B. KTHN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $92.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $157.87B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFSC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKTHN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • EFSC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KTHN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, KTHN is a better buy in the long-term than EFSC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFSC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KTHN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFSC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • KTHN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EFSC is a better buy in the short-term than KTHN.

Price Growth

EFSC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.63% price change this week, while KTHN (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFSC is expected to report earnings on Jan 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.93% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFSC($2.08B) has a higher market cap than KTHN($92.3M). EFSC (10.96) and KTHN (10.70) have similar P/E ratio . EFSC YTD gains are higher at: 4.093 vs. KTHN (0.000). EFSC has more cash in the bank: 208M vs. KTHN (9.02M). KTHN has less debt than EFSC: KTHN (30M) vs EFSC (668M). EFSC has higher revenues than KTHN: EFSC (593M) vs KTHN (38.9M).
EFSCKTHNEFSC / KTHN
Capitalization2.08B92.3M2,254%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.0930.000-
P/E Ratio10.9610.70102%
Revenue593M38.9M1,524%
Total Cash208M9.02M2,306%
Total Debt668M30M2,227%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFSC vs KTHN: Fundamental Ratings
EFSC
KTHN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5565
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4215
SMR RATING
1..100
1558
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5947
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6630
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8549

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KTHN's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as EFSC (48) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KTHN’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

KTHN's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as EFSC (42) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KTHN’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KTHN (58) in the null industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew somewhat faster than KTHN’s over the last 12 months.

KTHN's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as EFSC (59) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KTHN’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

KTHN's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EFSC (66) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KTHN’s stock grew somewhat faster than EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFSCKTHN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
18%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
41%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
17%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFSC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KTHN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSPYX22.100.31
+1.42%
Columbia Small Cap Index Inst3
TRMIX33.790.26
+0.78%
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value I
PJGCX14.140.04
+0.28%
PGIM Jennison Focused Value C
BIBDX12.180.03
+0.25%
BlackRock Global Dividend Instl
LEOOX9.52N/A
N/A
Lazard Enhanced Opportunities Open

EFSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFSC has been closely correlated with WSFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFSC jumps, then WSFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFSC
1D Price
Change %
EFSC100%
+2.14%
WSFS - EFSC
88%
Closely correlated
+1.85%
BUSE - EFSC
87%
Closely correlated
+2.73%
UCB - EFSC
87%
Closely correlated
+1.56%
SBCF - EFSC
86%
Closely correlated
+3.69%
GABC - EFSC
86%
Closely correlated
+2.03%
More

KTHN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KTHN and FUNC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KTHN and FUNC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KTHN
1D Price
Change %
KTHN100%
+0.69%
FUNC - KTHN
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.79%
EFSC - KTHN
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.14%
BHRB - KTHN
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.39%
QNBC - KTHN
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NBTB - KTHN
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.34%
More