EFSC
Price
$59.08
Change
-$0.47 (-0.79%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
73 days until earnings call
FUNC
Price
$34.54
Change
-$0.22 (-0.63%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
76 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EFSC vs FUNC

Header iconEFSC vs FUNC Comparison
Open Charts EFSC vs FUNCBanner chart's image
Enterprise Financial Services
Price$59.08
Change-$0.47 (-0.79%)
Volume$134.61K
CapitalizationN/A
First United
Price$34.54
Change-$0.22 (-0.63%)
Volume$21.18K
CapitalizationN/A
EFSC vs FUNC Comparison Chart
Loading...
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFSC vs. FUNC commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFSC is a StrongBuy and FUNC is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (EFSC: $59.08 vs. FUNC: $34.54)
Brand notoriety: EFSC and FUNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFSC: 81% vs. FUNC: 116%
Market capitalization -- EFSC: $1.47B vs. FUNC: $152.19M
EFSC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.47B. FUNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $152.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFSC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFUNC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EFSC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FUNC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the long-term than EFSC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFSC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FUNC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFSC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FUNC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EFSC is a better buy in the short-term than FUNC.

Price Growth

EFSC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.07% price change this week, while FUNC (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFSC is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2025.

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.80% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFSC($1.47B) has a higher market cap than FUNC($152M). FUNC has higher P/E ratio than EFSC: FUNC (10.14) vs EFSC (7.73). FUNC YTD gains are higher at: 51.905 vs. EFSC (34.788). EFSC has more cash in the bank: 193M vs. FUNC (86.9M). FUNC has less debt than EFSC: FUNC (112M) vs EFSC (204M). EFSC has higher revenues than FUNC: EFSC (550M) vs FUNC (71.3M).
EFSCFUNCEFSC / FUNC
Capitalization1.47B152M967%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD34.78851.90567%
P/E Ratio7.7310.1476%
Revenue550M71.3M771%
Total Cash193M86.9M222%
Total Debt204M112M182%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFSC vs FUNC: Fundamental Ratings
EFSC
FUNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7710
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3724
SMR RATING
1..100
1246
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3837
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
179
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1275

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUNC's Valuation (64) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (74). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (37). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUNC (46). This means that EFSC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (38). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (17). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFSCFUNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

EFSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFSC has been closely correlated with NWBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFSC jumps, then NWBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFSC
1D Price
Change %
EFSC100%
-0.79%
NWBI - EFSC
87%
Closely correlated
-0.88%
NBTB - EFSC
87%
Closely correlated
-1.37%
ONB - EFSC
86%
Closely correlated
-1.76%
BUSE - EFSC
86%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
TRST - EFSC
86%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
More

FUNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been loosely correlated with EFSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then EFSC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNC
1D Price
Change %
FUNC100%
-0.63%
EFSC - FUNC
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
NWBI - FUNC
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
NBTB - FUNC
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.37%
OCFC - FUNC
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.25%
PRK - FUNC
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
More