EFRTF
Price
$5.61
Change
+$0.13 (+2.37%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
388.52M
FBBPF
Price
$3.77
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.24B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFRTF vs FBBPF

Header iconEFRTF vs FBBPF Comparison
Open Charts EFRTF vs FBBPFBanner chart's image
Nexus Industrial REIT
Price$5.61
Change+$0.13 (+2.37%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization388.52M
FIBRA PROLOGIS REIT CTFS
Price$3.77
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.64K
Capitalization4.24B
EFRTF vs FBBPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EFRTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FBBPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFRTF vs. FBBPF commentary
Jul 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFRTF is a Hold and FBBPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 08, 2025
Stock price -- (EFRTF: $5.61 vs. FBBPF: $3.77)
Brand notoriety: EFRTF and FBBPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFRTF: 20% vs. FBBPF: 9%
Market capitalization -- EFRTF: $388.52M vs. FBBPF: $4.24B
EFRTF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $388.52M. FBBPF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $4.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFRTF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFBBPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EFRTF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FBBPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FBBPF is a better buy in the long-term than EFRTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFRTF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FBBPF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFRTF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FBBPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EFRTF is a better buy in the short-term than FBBPF.

Price Growth

EFRTF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +2.10% price change this week, while FBBPF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -0.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.40%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.28% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBBPF($4.24B) has a higher market cap than EFRTF($389M). FBBPF has higher P/E ratio than EFRTF: FBBPF (11.17) vs EFRTF (3.21). FBBPF YTD gains are higher at: 33.451 vs. EFRTF (4.041). FBBPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.52B vs. EFRTF (202M). FBBPF has more cash in the bank: 7.78B vs. EFRTF (5.92M). EFRTF has less debt than FBBPF: EFRTF (1.19B) vs FBBPF (15.8B). FBBPF has higher revenues than EFRTF: FBBPF (5.58B) vs EFRTF (158M).
EFRTFFBBPFEFRTF / FBBPF
Capitalization389M4.24B9%
EBITDA202M6.52B3%
Gain YTD4.04133.45112%
P/E Ratio3.2111.1729%
Revenue158M5.58B3%
Total Cash5.92M7.78B0%
Total Debt1.19B15.8B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFRTF vs FBBPF: Fundamental Ratings
EFRTF
FBBPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7757
SMR RATING
1..100
7750
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5049
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
415
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EFRTF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FBBPF (64). This means that EFRTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FBBPF’s over the last 12 months.

FBBPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as EFRTF (77). This means that FBBPF’s stock grew similarly to EFRTF’s over the last 12 months.

FBBPF's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as EFRTF (77). This means that FBBPF’s stock grew similarly to EFRTF’s over the last 12 months.

FBBPF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as EFRTF (50). This means that FBBPF’s stock grew similarly to EFRTF’s over the last 12 months.

EFRTF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as FBBPF (15). This means that EFRTF’s stock grew similarly to FBBPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFRTFFBBPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
41%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFRTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FBBPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ITHCX38.890.55
+1.43%
Invesco Technology C
ICFAX9.700.09
+0.94%
ICON Consumer Select Investor
VNVAX24.310.20
+0.83%
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap A
SCSAX17.460.12
+0.69%
Allspring Common Stock A
HSWCX20.310.03
+0.15%
Hartford Schroders International Stk C

EFRTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EFRTF and ARESF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EFRTF and ARESF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFRTF
1D Price
Change %
EFRTF100%
+2.29%
ARESF - EFRTF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SURVF - EFRTF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RFNDF - EFRTF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDPYF - EFRTF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
CROMF - EFRTF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FBBPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBBPF and DEXSF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBBPF and DEXSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBBPF
1D Price
Change %
FBBPF100%
N/A
DEXSF - FBBPF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DREUF - FBBPF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
EFRTF - FBBPF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.29%
FRMUF - FBBPF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.11%
FESNF - FBBPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More