EFRGF
Price
$0.49
Change
+$0.01 (+2.08%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
73.93M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MRIRF
Price
$0.54
Change
+$0.47 (+671.43%)
Updated
Dec 19 closing price
Capitalization
1.35M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFRGF vs MRIRF

Header iconEFRGF vs MRIRF Comparison
Open Charts EFRGF vs MRIRFBanner chart's image
Pasofino Gold
Price$0.49
Change+$0.01 (+2.08%)
Volume$6K
Capitalization73.93M
Route 109 Resources
Price$0.54
Change+$0.47 (+671.43%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization1.35M
EFRGF vs MRIRF Comparison Chart in %
EFRGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MRIRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFRGF vs. MRIRF commentary
Dec 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFRGF is a Hold and MRIRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2025
Stock price -- (EFRGF: $0.49 vs. MRIRF: $0.54)
Brand notoriety: EFRGF and MRIRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFRGF: 25% vs. MRIRF: 56%
Market capitalization -- EFRGF: $73.93M vs. MRIRF: $1.35M
EFRGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $73.93M. MRIRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $125.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFRGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMRIRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EFRGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MRIRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EFRGF and MRIRF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFRGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRIRF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFRGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MRIRF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MRIRF is a better buy in the short-term than EFRGF.

Price Growth

EFRGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +2.73% price change this week, while MRIRF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +90.36%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.32% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFRGF($73.9M) has a higher market cap than MRIRF($1.35M). MRIRF YTD gains are higher at: 1644.300 vs. EFRGF (20.393). MRIRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -239.87K vs. EFRGF (-9.81M). EFRGF has more cash in the bank: 1.58M vs. MRIRF (39.6K). EFRGF (0) and MRIRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
EFRGFMRIRFEFRGF / MRIRF
Capitalization73.9M1.35M5,486%
EBITDA-9.81M-239.87K4,088%
Gain YTD20.3931644.3001%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.58M39.6K3,990%
Total DebtN/A191K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFRGF: Fundamental Ratings
EFRGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
17
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFRGFMRIRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
63%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
76%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
75%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFRGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MRIRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BGMSP4.200.45
+12.00%
Bio Green Med Solution Inc
RDY14.160.07
+0.50%
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd
CIVB23.030.01
+0.04%
Civista Bancshares
SQNS4.76-0.01
-0.21%
Sequans Communications S.A.
OLMA26.23-1.22
-4.44%
Olema Pharmaceuticals

EFRGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EFRGF and MRIRF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EFRGF and MRIRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFRGF
1D Price
Change %
EFRGF100%
+2.73%
MRIRF - EFRGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CALRF - EFRGF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNL - EFRGF
-3%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
PHNMF - EFRGF
-4%
Poorly correlated
-4.36%
GRLGF - EFRGF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MRIRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRIRF has been loosely correlated with TAJIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRIRF jumps, then TAJIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRIRF
1D Price
Change %
MRIRF100%
N/A
TAJIF - MRIRF
52%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KSTBF - MRIRF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EFRGF - MRIRF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A