EFRGF
Price
$0.47
Change
+$0.01 (+2.17%)
Updated
Jan 12 closing price
Capitalization
74.01M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GMINF
Price
$28.25
Change
-$2.14 (-7.04%)
Updated
Jan 13 closing price
Capitalization
6.41B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFRGF vs GMINF

Header iconEFRGF vs GMINF Comparison
Open Charts EFRGF vs GMINFBanner chart's image
Pasofino Gold
Price$0.47
Change+$0.01 (+2.17%)
Volume$41K
Capitalization74.01M
G Mining Ventures
Price$28.25
Change-$2.14 (-7.04%)
Volume$57.31K
Capitalization6.41B
EFRGF vs GMINF Comparison Chart in %
EFRGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GMINF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFRGF vs. GMINF commentary
Jan 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFRGF is a Hold and GMINF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 14, 2026
Stock price -- (EFRGF: $0.47 vs. GMINF: $28.25)
Brand notoriety: EFRGF and GMINF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFRGF: 155% vs. GMINF: 64%
Market capitalization -- EFRGF: $74.01M vs. GMINF: $6.41B
EFRGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $74.01M. GMINF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $6.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $143.87B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFRGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGMINF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EFRGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GMINF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GMINF is a better buy in the long-term than EFRGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFRGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GMINF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFRGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GMINF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GMINF is a better buy in the short-term than EFRGF.

Price Growth

EFRGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +14.21% price change this week, while GMINF (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +22.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +102.14%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.33% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMINF($6.41B) has a higher market cap than EFRGF($74M). EFRGF YTD gains are higher at: 11.000 vs. GMINF (-6.673). GMINF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 344M vs. EFRGF (-9.81M). GMINF has more cash in the bank: 94.6M vs. EFRGF (1.58M). GMINF has higher revenues than EFRGF: GMINF (492M) vs EFRGF (0).
EFRGFGMINFEFRGF / GMINF
Capitalization74M6.41B1%
EBITDA-9.81M344M-3%
Gain YTD11.000-6.673-165%
P/E RatioN/A25.00-
Revenue0492M-
Total Cash1.58M94.6M2%
Total DebtN/A120M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFRGF: Fundamental Ratings
EFRGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
87
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
19
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFRGFGMINF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
76%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFRGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GMINF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CPOAX47.800.44
+0.93%
Morgan Stanley Insight A
AGTHX82.59-0.24
-0.29%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer A
LAMYX25.96-0.09
-0.35%
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth I
LIRSX10.72-0.04
-0.37%
Lord Abbett International Value R4
GPGCX17.32-0.13
-0.74%
Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Instl

EFRGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EFRGF and GMINF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EFRGF and GMINF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFRGF
1D Price
Change %
EFRGF100%
N/A
GMINF - EFRGF
22%
Poorly correlated
-7.04%
MRIRF - EFRGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CALRF - EFRGF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNL - EFRGF
-3%
Poorly correlated
+4.20%
PHNMF - EFRGF
-4%
Poorly correlated
-11.94%
More

GMINF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GMINF and EDVMF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMINF and EDVMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMINF
1D Price
Change %
GMINF100%
-7.04%
EDVMF - GMINF
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.51%
GRCAF - GMINF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RGCCF - GMINF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
RGRNF - GMINF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EFRGF - GMINF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More