EFGIF
Price
$13.24
Change
-$1.76 (-11.73%)
Updated
Apr 8 closing price
Capitalization
2.8B
SMFNF
Price
$23.37
Change
-$1.33 (-5.38%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
61.94B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFGIF vs SMFNF

Header iconEFGIF vs SMFNF Comparison
Open Charts EFGIF vs SMFNFBanner chart's image
EFG International AG
Price$13.24
Change-$1.76 (-11.73%)
Volume$206
Capitalization2.8B
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group
Price$23.37
Change-$1.33 (-5.38%)
Volume$85.79K
Capitalization61.94B
EFGIF vs SMFNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SMFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFGIF vs. SMFNF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFGIF is a Hold and SMFNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (EFGIF: $13.24 vs. SMFNF: $23.37)
Brand notoriety: EFGIF and SMFNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFGIF: 100% vs. SMFNF: 262%
Market capitalization -- EFGIF: $2.8B vs. SMFNF: $61.94B
EFGIF [@Major Banks] is valued at $2.8B. SMFNF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $61.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFGIF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSMFNF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EFGIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SMFNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMFNF is a better buy in the long-term than EFGIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMFNF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SMFNF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

EFGIF (@Major Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SMFNF (@Major Banks) price change was -5.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +3.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+3.36% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFNF($61.9B) has a higher market cap than EFGIF($2.8B). EFGIF has higher P/E ratio than SMFNF: EFGIF (14.68) vs SMFNF (10.93). SMFNF YTD gains are higher at: 3.407 vs. EFGIF (-4.123). EFGIF has less debt than SMFNF: EFGIF (32.9M) vs SMFNF (29.38T). SMFNF has higher revenues than EFGIF: SMFNF (3.72T) vs EFGIF (1.4B).
EFGIFSMFNFEFGIF / SMFNF
Capitalization2.8B61.9B5%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-4.1233.407-121%
P/E Ratio14.6810.93134%
Revenue1.4B3.72T0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt32.9M29.38T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFGIF vs SMFNF: Fundamental Ratings
EFGIF
SMFNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5092
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
627
SMR RATING
1..100
141
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6062
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5777
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a33

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMFNF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is in the same range as EFGIF (73). This means that SMFNF’s stock grew similarly to EFGIF’s over the last 12 months.

EFGIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as SMFNF (27). This means that EFGIF’s stock grew similarly to SMFNF’s over the last 12 months.

SMFNF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as EFGIF (14). This means that SMFNF’s stock grew similarly to EFGIF’s over the last 12 months.

EFGIF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as SMFNF (62). This means that EFGIF’s stock grew similarly to SMFNF’s over the last 12 months.

EFGIF's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as SMFNF (77). This means that EFGIF’s stock grew similarly to SMFNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFGIFSMFNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SMFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTCSX38.870.35
+0.91%
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth C
JABVX10.540.09
+0.86%
JHancock Global Environmental Opps I
CDHAX34.610.26
+0.76%
Calvert International Responsible Idx A
WSHCX62.220.26
+0.42%
American Funds Washington Mutual C
FIQAX16.620.05
+0.30%
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Z

EFGIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EFGIF and SMFNF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EFGIF and SMFNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFGIF
1D Price
Change %
EFGIF100%
N/A
SMFNF - EFGIF
3%
Poorly correlated
-5.38%
ANZGY - EFGIF
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.65%
SVNLF - EFGIF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
CABPF - EFGIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANZGF - EFGIF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
More

SMFNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMFNF and SMFG have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMFNF and SMFG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMFNF
1D Price
Change %
SMFNF100%
-5.38%
SMFG - SMFNF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
CMWAY - SMFNF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.17%
BACHF - SMFNF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.57%
HBCYF - SMFNF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.57%
MUFG - SMFNF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
More