Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EFG vs UMMA
EFG vs UMMA Comparison
Open Charts EFG vs UMMA
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
Price$112.09
Change-$0.20 (-0.18%)
Volume$705.36K
Net Assets13.17B
Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF
Price$26.93
Change-$0.07 (-0.26%)
Volume$19.38K
Net Assets155.44M
EFG vs UMMA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EFG vs. UMMA commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFG is a Hold and UMMA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFG has more net assets: 13.2B vs. UMMA (155M). EFG has a higher annual dividend yield than UMMA: EFG (16.897) vs UMMA (14.251). EFG was incepted earlier than UMMA: EFG (20 years) vs UMMA (4 years). EFG (0.36) has a lower expense ratio than UMMA (0.65). EFG has a higher turnover UMMA (11.00) vs UMMA (11.00).
| EFG | UMMA | EFG / UMMA | |
| Gain YTD | 16.897 | 14.251 | 119% |
| Net Assets | 13.2B | 155M | 8,516% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.65 | 55% |
| Turnover | 22.00 | 11.00 | 200% |
| Yield | 1.58 | 0.82 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EFG | UMMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFG has been closely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFG jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFG | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| ASML - EFG | 68% Closely correlated | -1.91% | ||
| ALC - EFG | 66% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| SAP - EFG | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| BHP - EFG | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.70% | ||
| RACE - EFG | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
More | ||||
UMMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMMA has been closely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMMA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UMMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMMA | 100% | -0.26% | ||
| ASML - UMMA | 68% Closely correlated | -1.91% | ||
| SAP - UMMA | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| TSM - UMMA | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.66% | ||
| BHP - UMMA | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.70% | ||
| RIO - UMMA | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.14% | ||
More | ||||