| EFG | PCIG | EFG / PCIG | |
| Gain YTD | 19.421 | 0.710 | 2,736% |
| Net Assets | 9.4B | 24.7M | 38,045% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 22.00 | N/A | - |
| Yield | 1.55 | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 2 years | - |
| EFG | PCIG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 82% | 17 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 57% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFG has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFG jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that PCIG and ONON have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCIG and ONON's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PCIG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCIG | 100% | +1.49% | ||
| ONON - PCIG | 14% Poorly correlated | +4.25% | ||
| SHOP - PCIG | 13% Poorly correlated | +2.02% | ||
| MDT - PCIG | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.06% | ||
| DSY - PCIG | 11% Poorly correlated | -5.03% | ||
| ASML - PCIG | 11% Poorly correlated | +2.90% | ||
More | ||||