| EFG | PCIG | EFG / PCIG | |
| Gain YTD | 4.363 | 2.086 | 209% |
| Net Assets | 9.79B | 24.7M | 39,636% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 23.00 | N/A | - |
| Yield | 2.53 | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 2 years | - |
| EFG | PCIG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 82% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFG has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFG jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that PCIG and ONON have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCIG and ONON's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PCIG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCIG | 100% | -1.84% | ||
| ONON - PCIG | 14% Poorly correlated | -4.63% | ||
| SHOP - PCIG | 13% Poorly correlated | -5.93% | ||
| MDT - PCIG | 12% Poorly correlated | +2.41% | ||
| DSY - PCIG | 12% Poorly correlated | -2.27% | ||
| ASML - PCIG | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
More | ||||