| EFG | PCIG | EFG / PCIG | |
| Gain YTD | 19.588 | 0.438 | 4,471% |
| Net Assets | 9.45B | 24.7M | 38,239% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 23.00 | N/A | - |
| Yield | 1.55 | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 2 years | - |
| EFG | PCIG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 82% | 10 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 74% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFG has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFG jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that PCIG and ONON have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCIG and ONON's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PCIG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCIG | 100% | +0.06% | ||
| ONON - PCIG | 14% Poorly correlated | -2.92% | ||
| SHOP - PCIG | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.05% | ||
| MDT - PCIG | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.21% | ||
| DSY - PCIG | 12% Poorly correlated | +4.86% | ||
| ASML - PCIG | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
More | ||||