EFG | IMTM | EFG / IMTM | |
Gain YTD | 16.240 | 26.669 | 61% |
Net Assets | 13.2B | 3.22B | 410% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.30 | 120% |
Turnover | 22.00 | 70.00 | 31% |
Yield | 1.65 | 2.49 | 66% |
Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
EFG | IMTM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago89% | 4 days ago63% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% | 4 days ago69% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 4 days ago83% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | 4 days ago83% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 4 days ago80% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% | 4 days ago77% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago82% | 4 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago82% | 17 days ago77% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago67% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago83% | 4 days ago83% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFG has been closely correlated with SAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFG jumps, then SAP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMTM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMTM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMTM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IMTM | 100% | +0.06% | ||
BN - IMTM | 72% Closely correlated | -0.95% | ||
MFC - IMTM | 70% Closely correlated | +0.36% | ||
SAN - IMTM | 69% Closely correlated | +0.94% | ||
NWG - IMTM | 69% Closely correlated | +2.29% | ||
SAP - IMTM | 68% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
More |