Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EFCNX vs RGAHX
EFCNX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts EFCNX vs RGAHX
Emerald Insights Investor
Price$23.52
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.19M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$83.30
Change+$0.28 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
EFCNX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EFCNX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFCNX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. EFCNX (18.2M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than EFCNX: RGAHX (0.47) vs EFCNX (0.00). EFCNX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: EFCNX (11 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). EFCNX (2.08) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). EFCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EFCNX: RGAHX (250) vs EFCNX (2000). EFCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.44 vs. RGAHX (17.89). EFCNX return over 5 years is better than : 61.32 vs. RGAHX (49.57).
| EFCNX | RGAHX | EFCNX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.44 | 318% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.08 | 0.44 | 473% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.590 | 13.426 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.2M | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.44 | 17.89 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.43 | 58.90 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.32 | 49.57 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.70 | N/A | - |