Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EFCNX vs RGACX
EFCNX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts EFCNX vs RGACX
Emerald Insights Investor
Price$22.68
Change-$0.03 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.16M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
EFCNX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EFCNX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFCNX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. EFCNX (19.2M). RGACX pays higher dividends than EFCNX: RGACX (0.07) vs EFCNX (0.00). EFCNX was incepted earlier than RGACX: EFCNX (11 years) vs RGACX (23 years). EFCNX (2.08) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). EFCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than EFCNX: RGACX (250) vs EFCNX (2000). EFCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.89 vs. RGACX (14.08). EFCNX return over 5 years is better than : 45.66 vs. RGACX (41.95).
| EFCNX | RGACX | EFCNX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.94 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.08 | 0.94 | 221% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.569 | 14.044 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.2M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.89 | 14.08 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.51 | 41.19 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.66 | 41.95 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.50 | 83.68 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement