Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EFCCX vs RGAHX
EFCCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts EFCCX vs RGAHX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$81.72
Change+$0.80 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
EFCCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EFCCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFCCX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. EFCCX (22.8M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than EFCCX: RGAHX (0.47) vs EFCCX (0.00). EFCCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: EFCCX (11 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). EFCCX (2.72) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). EFCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EFCCX: RGAHX (250) vs EFCCX (2000). EFCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.43 vs. RGAHX (10.98). EFCCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.65 vs. RGAHX (50.13).
| EFCCX | RGAHX | EFCCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.44 | 455% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.72 | 0.44 | 618% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.176 | 11.275 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.8M | 323B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.43 | 10.98 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.28 | 60.14 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.65 | 50.13 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement