Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EFCCX vs RGABX
EFCCX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts EFCCX vs RGABX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$78.86
Change+$0.99 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
EFCCX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EFCCX vs. RGABX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFCCX is a Hold and RGABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. EFCCX (32.4M). EFCCX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . EFCCX was incepted earlier than RGABX: EFCCX (11 years) vs RGABX (23 years). EFCCX (2.51) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). EFCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than EFCCX: RGABX (250) vs EFCCX (2000). EFCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.05 vs. RGABX (9.77). EFCCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.92 vs. RGABX (32.07).
| EFCCX | RGABX | EFCCX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.39 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.51 | 1.39 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.205 | 17.239 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.4M | 337B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.05 | 9.77 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 93.64 | 65.96 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.92 | 32.07 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.23 | 84.44 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement