Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EFCAX vs RGAHX
EFCAX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts EFCAX vs RGAHX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$77.22
Change-$0.93 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
EFCAX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EFCAX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFCAX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. EFCAX (21.3M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than EFCAX: RGAHX (0.50) vs EFCAX (0.00). EFCAX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: EFCAX (11 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). EFCAX (2.03) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). EFCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EFCAX: RGAHX (250) vs EFCAX (2000). EFCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.11 vs. RGAHX (7.38). EFCAX return over 5 years is better than : 61.33 vs. RGAHX (49.84).
| EFCAX | RGAHX | EFCAX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.44 | 307% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.44 | 461% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.227 | 5.147 | 43% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.3M | 306B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.11 | 7.38 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.85 | 53.85 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.33 | 49.84 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.88 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement