Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EFCAX vs RGAHX
EFCAX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts EFCAX vs RGAHX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$83.30
Change+$0.28 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
EFCAX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EFCAX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFCAX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. EFCAX (18.2M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than EFCAX: RGAHX (0.47) vs EFCAX (0.00). EFCAX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: EFCAX (11 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). EFCAX (2.03) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). EFCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EFCAX: RGAHX (250) vs EFCAX (2000). EFCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.59 vs. RGAHX (17.89). EFCAX return over 5 years is better than : 62.25 vs. RGAHX (49.57).
| EFCAX | RGAHX | EFCAX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.44 | 307% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.44 | 461% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.654 | 13.426 | 94% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.2M | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.59 | 17.89 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.87 | 58.90 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.25 | 49.57 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.54 | N/A | - |