Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EFCAX vs RGAHX
EFCAX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts EFCAX vs RGAHX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$81.72
Change+$0.80 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
EFCAX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EFCAX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFCAX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. EFCAX (22.8M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than EFCAX: RGAHX (0.47) vs EFCAX (0.00). EFCAX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: EFCAX (11 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). EFCAX (2.03) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). EFCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EFCAX: RGAHX (250) vs EFCAX (2000). EFCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.86 vs. RGAHX (10.98). EFCAX return over 5 years is better than : 62.38 vs. RGAHX (50.13).
| EFCAX | RGAHX | EFCAX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.44 | 307% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.44 | 461% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.431 | 11.275 | 84% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.8M | 323B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.86 | 10.98 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.83 | 60.14 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.38 | 50.13 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement