Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EFCAX vs RGACX
EFCAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts EFCAX vs RGACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.36
Change+$0.32 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.88B
EFCAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EFCAX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFCAX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. EFCAX (35.4M). RGACX pays higher dividends than EFCAX: RGACX (0.07) vs EFCAX (0.00). EFCAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: EFCAX (11 years) vs RGACX (23 years). EFCAX (2.03) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). EFCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than EFCAX: RGACX (250) vs EFCAX (2000). EFCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.09 vs. RGACX (12.22). EFCAX return over 5 years is better than : 57.81 vs. RGACX (45.63).
| EFCAX | RGACX | EFCAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.94 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.94 | 216% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.725 | 17.183 | 103% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.4M | 337B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.09 | 12.22 | 189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 101.79 | 71.26 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.81 | 45.63 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.73 | 111.15 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement