Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EFAS vs FNDF
EFAS vs FNDF Comparison
Open Charts EFAS vs FNDF
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
Price$17.98
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$19.18K
Net Assets21.73M
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
Price$39.99
Change+$0.29 (+0.73%)
Volume$961.18K
Net Assets16.38B
EFAS vs FNDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EFAS vs. FNDF commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFAS is a Hold and FNDF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDF has more net assets: 16.4B vs. EFAS (21.7M). EFAS has a higher annual dividend yield than FNDF: EFAS (31.874) vs FNDF (21.068). EFAS was incepted earlier than FNDF: EFAS (9 years) vs FNDF (12 years). FNDF (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than EFAS (0.55). EFAS has a higher turnover FNDF (12.00) vs FNDF (12.00).
| EFAS | FNDF | EFAS / FNDF | |
| Gain YTD | 31.874 | 21.068 | 151% |
| Net Assets | 21.7M | 16.4B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.25 | 220% |
| Turnover | 64.02 | 12.00 | 534% |
| Yield | 5.48 | 3.41 | 160% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EFAS | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EFAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFAS has been loosely correlated with TEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EFAS jumps, then TEF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFAS | 100% | N/A | ||
| TEF - EFAS | 54% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| WDS - EFAS | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.47% | ||
| TEL - EFAS | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| ORA - EFAS | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| VOD - EFAS | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.03% | ||
More | ||||
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with BNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then BNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | +0.73% | ||
| BNS - FNDF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| BN - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| BHP - FNDF | 70% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| BMO - FNDF | 69% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| RY - FNDF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
More | ||||