Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EFAS vs FNDF
EFAS vs FNDF Comparison
Open Charts EFAS vs FNDF
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
Price$19.63
Change-$0.06 (-0.30%)
Volume$100
Net Assets36.5M
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
Price$47.13
Change-$0.03 (-0.06%)
Volume$3.36K
Net Assets20.37B
EFAS vs FNDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EFAS vs. FNDF commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFAS is a Hold and FNDF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDF has more net assets: 20.4B vs. EFAS (36.5M). FNDF has a higher annual dividend yield than EFAS: FNDF (4.313) vs EFAS (1.494). EFAS was incepted earlier than FNDF: EFAS (9 years) vs FNDF (12 years). FNDF (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than EFAS (0.55). EFAS has a higher turnover FNDF (12.00) vs FNDF (12.00).
| EFAS | FNDF | EFAS / FNDF | |
| Gain YTD | 1.494 | 4.313 | 35% |
| Net Assets | 36.5M | 20.4B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.25 | 220% |
| Turnover | 64.02 | 12.00 | 534% |
| Yield | 4.85 | 3.43 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EFAS | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 14 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 14 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 74% | about 1 month ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
EFAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFAS has been loosely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EFAS jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFAS | 100% | +0.46% | ||
| BHP - EFAS | 65% Loosely correlated | +3.17% | ||
| RIO - EFAS | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.74% | ||
| WDS - EFAS | 49% Loosely correlated | +2.02% | ||
| BBVA - EFAS | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| VOD - EFAS | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.44% | ||
More | ||||
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | +1.07% | ||
| STM - FNDF | 75% Closely correlated | -1.93% | ||
| BNT - FNDF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| SAN - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| BAM - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| BHP - FNDF | 69% Closely correlated | +3.17% | ||
More | ||||