EFA | IMTM | EFA / IMTM | |
Gain YTD | 23.314 | 26.669 | 87% |
Net Assets | 66.4B | 3.22B | 2,062% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.30 | 107% |
Turnover | 3.00 | 70.00 | 4% |
Yield | 2.96 | 2.49 | 118% |
Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
EFA | IMTM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago74% | 4 days ago63% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago73% | 4 days ago69% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago83% | 4 days ago83% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago88% | 4 days ago83% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% | 4 days ago80% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago78% | 4 days ago77% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago80% | 17 days ago77% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago74% | 4 days ago67% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago83% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFA has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFA jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMTM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMTM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMTM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IMTM | 100% | +0.06% | ||
BN - IMTM | 72% Closely correlated | -0.95% | ||
MFC - IMTM | 70% Closely correlated | +0.36% | ||
SAN - IMTM | 69% Closely correlated | +0.94% | ||
NWG - IMTM | 69% Closely correlated | +2.29% | ||
SAP - IMTM | 68% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
More |