Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EFA vs IMFL
EFA vs IMFL Comparison
Open Charts EFA vs IMFL
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Price$96.45
Change+$0.04 (+0.04%)
Volume$1.94K
Net Assets70.46B
Invesco Intl Dev Dynmc Mltfctr ETF
Price$29.79
Change-$0.13 (-0.43%)
Volume$1.35K
Net Assets666.61M
EFA vs IMFL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EFA vs. IMFL commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFA is a StrongBuy and IMFL is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFA has more net assets: 70.5B vs. IMFL (667M). IMFL (30.294) and EFA (29.718) have matching annual dividend yield . EFA was incepted earlier than IMFL: EFA (24 years) vs IMFL (5 years). EFA (0.32) has a lower expense ratio than IMFL (0.34). IMFL has a higher turnover EFA (4.00) vs EFA (4.00).
| EFA | IMFL | EFA / IMFL | |
| Gain YTD | 29.718 | 30.294 | 98% |
| Net Assets | 70.5B | 667M | 10,570% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.34 | 94% |
| Turnover | 4.00 | 65.00 | 6% |
| Yield | 2.71 | 2.13 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EFA | IMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 79% | 10 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 5 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
EFA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFA has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFA jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
IMFL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMFL has been loosely correlated with FER. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IMFL jumps, then FER could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMFL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMFL | 100% | +0.50% | ||
| FER - IMFL | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| SAN - IMFL | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| SAP - IMFL | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| ALC - IMFL | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| BN - IMFL | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
More | ||||