EFA | IMFL | EFA / IMFL | |
Gain YTD | 27.162 | 23.987 | 113% |
Net Assets | 68.1B | 647M | 10,526% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.34 | 94% |
Turnover | 3.00 | 156.00 | 2% |
Yield | 2.75 | 2.24 | 123% |
Fund Existence | 24 years | 5 years | - |
EFA | IMFL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago74% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago80% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago86% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago79% | 10 days ago80% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago79% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago80% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFA has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFA jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMFL has been loosely correlated with FER. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IMFL jumps, then FER could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMFL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IMFL | 100% | +0.47% | ||
FER - IMFL | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.57% | ||
SAN - IMFL | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.31% | ||
SAP - IMFL | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
ALC - IMFL | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
BN - IMFL | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.00% | ||
More |