| EFA | EFAD | EFA / EFAD | |
| Gain YTD | 29.718 | 14.866 | 200% |
| Net Assets | 70.5B | 62.8M | 112,261% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.50 | 64% |
| Turnover | 4.00 | 40.00 | 10% |
| Yield | 2.71 | 2.30 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| EFA | EFAD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 8 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 79% | 10 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 75% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFA has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFA jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that EFAD and APA have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EFAD and APA's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFAD | 100% | -1.32% | ||
| APA - EFAD | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BNR - EFAD | 9% Poorly correlated | -2.57% | ||
| UCB - EFAD | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.25% | ||
| ASML - EFAD | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
| SAN - EFAD | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.51% | ||
More | ||||