EFA | EFAD | EFA / EFAD | |
Gain YTD | 23.502 | 15.679 | 150% |
Net Assets | 65.8B | 72.3M | 91,010% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.50 | 64% |
Turnover | 3.00 | 36.00 | 8% |
Yield | 2.82 | 2.24 | 126% |
Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
EFA | EFAD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 4 days ago76% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago80% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago74% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago77% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago80% | 5 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago81% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago74% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFA has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFA jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that EFAD and NEM have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EFAD and NEM's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EFAD | 100% | +0.72% | ||
NEM - EFAD | 6% Poorly correlated | +1.72% | ||
LOGI - EFAD | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.69% | ||
SAN - EFAD | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.52% | ||
CSL - EFAD | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.08% | ||
SOL - EFAD | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
More |