EFA | EFAD | EFA / EFAD | |
Gain YTD | 24.040 | 16.268 | 148% |
Net Assets | 66.4B | 72.6M | 91,460% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.50 | 64% |
Turnover | 3.00 | 36.00 | 8% |
Yield | 2.96 | 2.32 | 128% |
Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
EFA | EFAD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago62% | 3 days ago86% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago75% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago79% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago77% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 5 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago80% | 18 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago83% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago76% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFA has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFA jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that EFAD and NEM have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EFAD and NEM's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EFAD | 100% | +0.32% | ||
NEM - EFAD | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.24% | ||
LOGI - EFAD | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.60% | ||
SOL - EFAD | 3% Poorly correlated | -1.05% | ||
SAN - EFAD | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.21% | ||
CSL - EFAD | 0% Poorly correlated | -2.50% | ||
More |