EESE
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
385.94K
FGPHF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
31.05M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EESE vs FGPHF

Header iconEESE vs FGPHF Comparison
Open Charts EESE vs FGPHFBanner chart's image
Energy & Environmental Services
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$48K
Capitalization385.94K
First Graphene
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$823.54K
Capitalization31.05M
EESE vs FGPHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EESE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FGPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EESE vs. FGPHF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EESE is a StrongBuy and FGPHF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (EESE: $0.05 vs. FGPHF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: EESE and FGPHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EESE: 96% vs. FGPHF: 211%
Market capitalization -- EESE: $385.94K vs. FGPHF: $31.05M
EESE [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $385.94K. FGPHF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $31.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EESE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFGPHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EESE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FGPHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EESE is a better buy in the long-term than FGPHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EESE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FGPHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EESE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FGPHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EESE is a better buy in the short-term than FGPHF.

Price Growth

EESE (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FGPHF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +23.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+2.16% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGPHF($31.1M) has a higher market cap than EESE($386K). FGPHF YTD gains are higher at: 0.939 vs. EESE (-23.077). EESE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.65M vs. FGPHF (-4.93M). FGPHF has more cash in the bank: 8.05M vs. EESE (58.9K). EESE has less debt than FGPHF: EESE (4.44K) vs FGPHF (226K). FGPHF has higher revenues than EESE: FGPHF (842K) vs EESE (214K).
EESEFGPHFEESE / FGPHF
Capitalization386K31.1M1%
EBITDA-1.65M-4.93M33%
Gain YTD-23.0770.939-2,458%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue214K842K25%
Total Cash58.9K8.05M1%
Total Debt4.44K226K2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EESE vs FGPHF: Fundamental Ratings
EESE
FGPHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
501
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
798
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8590
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
69100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EESE's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as FGPHF (87). This means that EESE’s stock grew similarly to FGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

EESE's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FGPHF (100). This means that EESE’s stock grew similarly to FGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

EESE's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FGPHF (98). This means that EESE’s stock grew significantly faster than FGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

EESE's Price Growth Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as FGPHF (90). This means that EESE’s stock grew similarly to FGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

EESE's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as FGPHF (100). This means that EESE’s stock grew similarly to FGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EESEFGPHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EESE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FGPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NCRA1.610.17
+11.72%
Nocera
FWRD32.110.86
+2.75%
Forward Air Corp
FACT10.27N/A
N/A
Fact II Acquisition Corp
TU16.46-0.06
-0.36%
Telus Corp
ATHM28.09-0.12
-0.43%
Autohome

EESE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EESE and GPRE have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EESE and GPRE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EESE
1D Price
Change %
EESE100%
N/A
GPRE - EESE
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.85%
FGPHF - EESE
12%
Poorly correlated
+10.26%
DTPKF - EESE
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVKIY - EESE
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
DLNDY - EESE
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FGPHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FGPHF and ELMTY have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGPHF and ELMTY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGPHF
1D Price
Change %
FGPHF100%
+10.26%
ELMTY - FGPHF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EESE - FGPHF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVKIF - FGPHF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMNSF - FGPHF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPLSF - FGPHF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.77%
More