LTM | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EEMX | LTM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% | 4 days ago60% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago76% | 4 days ago22% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | 7 days ago84% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago77% | 4 days ago83% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago43% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 4 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 27 days ago84% | 5 days ago74% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago85% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 4 days ago11% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% | 4 days ago74% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
HACK | 84.94 | 1.57 | +1.88% |
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF | |||
GJH | 9.63 | 0.10 | +1.04% |
Synthetic Fixed-Income Sec STRATS 2004-06 | |||
SAUG | 24.82 | 0.12 | +0.49% |
FT Vest U.S. Sm Cp Mod Buf ETF -Aug | |||
WINC | 24.22 | N/A | N/A |
Western Asset Short Duration Income ETF | |||
RUNN | 34.60 | -0.03 | -0.08% |
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that EEMX and AC have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EEMX and AC's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEMX | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EEMX | 100% | +1.13% | ||
AC - EEMX | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ZLAB - EEMX | 16% Poorly correlated | +2.53% | ||
LTM - EEMX | 15% Poorly correlated | -2.08% | ||
PDD - EEMX | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.65% | ||
BAP - EEMX | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LTM has been loosely correlated with CPA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LTM jumps, then CPA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LTM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LTM | 100% | -2.08% | ||
CPA - LTM | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
RYAAY - LTM | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
SNCY - LTM | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.62% | ||
ALK - LTM | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
SKYW - LTM | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
More |