| EEMV | EMCR | EEMV / EMCR | |
| Gain YTD | 12.451 | 32.253 | 39% |
| Net Assets | 3.79B | 51.4M | 7,370% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.26 | 0.15 | 173% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 17.00 | 188% |
| Yield | 3.29 | 6.77 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
| EEMV | EMCR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 77% | 13 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 77% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JPIB | 49.01 | 0.03 | +0.06% |
| JPMorgan International Bond Opps ETF | |||
| MYCM | 24.92 | N/A | N/A |
| SPDR SSGA My2033 Corporate Bond ETF | |||
| DECM | 32.88 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF - Dec | |||
| IQM | 89.39 | -0.32 | -0.36% |
| Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF | |||
| OIA | 5.97 | -0.05 | -0.83% |
| INVESCO Municipal Income OPPORTUNITIES TRUST | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEMV has been loosely correlated with LTM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EEMV jumps, then LTM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEMV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMV | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| LTM - EEMV | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| TEL - EEMV | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| ZTO - EEMV | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| PDD - EEMV | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.38% | ||
| BAP - EEMV | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.71% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMCR has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMCR jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMCR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMCR | 100% | +0.76% | ||
| BZ - EMCR | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| JD - EMCR | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| ATHM - EMCR | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| WB - EMCR | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| PDD - EMCR | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.38% | ||
More | ||||